|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
US Robotics Routers?Anyone have any experience with these in a home network environment?
Supposedly they will allow a mixed environment of some "B" and some "G" devices to operate at their designed speed instead of dropping back the entire network to the "B" capability. Hi
I do not know in specific about the USR. Newer Wireless Router do not revert entirely to 802.11b, there are differences in how much "Hit" the 802.11g takes in presence of 802.11b, but there is always a "Hit". Client 802.11g cards are so inexpensive these day that there is No reason to compromise on buying mediocre Wireless devices. In addition usage of 802.11b usually reduces the security configuration to WEP, which is currently Highly insecure. Jack (MVP-Networking). Show quoteHide quote "Pegleg" <Peg***@usnavyret.mil> wrote in message news:1pcqf3djt38u5ip8rj1t43k7hfh4qgkk6v@4ax.com... > Anyone have any experience with these in a home network environment? > > Supposedly they will allow a mixed environment of some "B" and some "G" > devices to operate at their designed speed instead of dropping back the > entire network to the "B" capability. On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:07:01 -0400, "Jack \(MVP-Networking\)."
<j***@discussiongroup.com> wrote: >Client 802.11g cards are so inexpensive these day that there is No reason to I realize that however I use a PDA wirelessly that is only capable of>compromise on buying mediocre Wireless devices. ..11b. Both laptops we use are .11g. I have done some "unscientific" observations by watching the speed indicated on the laptops both before and after I get on the wireless network with my PDA and see no change. Of course I have no idea as to how accurate the speed indicator is in the XP(Home) system. With a .11g router I see anywhere from 18 Mbps to 54 Mbps on the laptops depending on where I am in the house. Signing in with the .11b PDA seems to result in no changes. In wireless technology only one host can communicate with a WAP at a time.
They have to take turns. So when it is "B's" turn to communicate it sends the packet,..because B is slower it takes more time for the Packet to complete the trip which causes the other to have to waite,...hence it slows down the WAP. The only thing I can think of is if the WAP has dual radios and uses two different channels so the B's can work over a different channel than the G's which might allow them to transceive at the same time or near the same time. You may still take some hit in performance. I don't know anything about the USRs but that is about the only thing I can think of that they might be doing,..and it is just a guess. -- Show quoteHide quotePhillip Windell www.wandtv.com The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. ----------------------------------------------------- "Pegleg" <Peg***@usnavyret.mil> wrote in message news:1pcqf3djt38u5ip8rj1t43k7hfh4qgkk6v@4ax.com... > Anyone have any experience with these in a home network environment? > > Supposedly they will allow a mixed environment of some "B" and some "G" > devices to operate at their designed speed instead of dropping back the > entire network to the "B" capability.
Ad hoc connection working, but ICS not working. Any help?
Wireless "N"? HELP Pleeease!!.Strong Wireless signal but can't get to internet laptop wireless network Wireless connection speed decreases strangely "Spoofing" an IP Address Wired ethernet not working after wireless setup laptop won't connect wirelessly what do i need to setup a wireless network+transfering files Netgear |
|||||||||||||||||||||||