|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue Resolved! Thankstypes of security. It seems that each vendor has their own name for things. As it turns out, I had it configured correctly all the time. The problem was simple: The print server could not support a wired and wireless connection at the same time. Since I had the wired connection up so I could monitor and change the encryption, the wireless would connect for 2-3 seconds and then drop, giving me the impression that there was something in the security that was not set right. Soooooooo, the lesson is: Once the wireless is configured via wired connection, disconnect the wired connection so wireless can take over. Thanks again, hope someone reads this and avoids the time that I spent on it. GWB Show quoteHide quote "Jack (MVP-Networking)." <j***@discussiongroup.com> wrote in message news:uuqY4jsGJHA.740@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > As mentioned by Lem, make sure that every thing works well with No > security, > From the weakest to the strongest, Wireless security capacity is. > No Security > MAC______(Band Aid if nothing else is available). > WEP64____(Easy, to "Break" by knowledgeable people). > WEP128___(A little Harder, but "Hackable" too). > WPA-PSK__(Very Hard to Break). > WPA-AES__(Not functionally Breakable) > WPA2____ (Not functionally Breakable). > Note 1: WPA-AES the the current entry level rendition of WPA2. > Note 2: If you use WinXP and did not updated it you would have to download > the WPA2 patch from Microsoft. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893357 > The documentation of your Wireless devices (Wireless Router, and Wireless > Computer's Card) should state the type of security that is available with > your Wireless hardware. > All devices MUST be set to the same security level using the same pass > phrase. > Therefore the security must be set according what ever is the best > possible of one of the Wireless devices. > I.e. even if most of your system might be capable to be configured to the > max. with WPA2, but one device is only capable to be configured to max . > of WEP, to whole system must be configured to WEP. > If you need more good security and one device (like a Wireless card that > can do WEP only) is holding better security for the whole Network, replace > the device with a better one. > Setting Wireless Security - http://www.ezlan.net/Wireless_Security.html > The Core differences between WEP, WPA, and WPA2 - > http://www.ezlan.net/wpa_wep.html > Jack (MVP-Networking). > > > "George W. Barrowcliff" <george.barrowcl***@flash.net> wrote in message > news:%23tJoXNgGJHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>I am using a Linksys G router with WPA Personal /TKIP security. Works >>great. >> I added an Airlink Wireless Print Server but cannot get it to communicate >> wirelessly. The server can see the access point and reports it in the >> survey so I know the wirless part is working. The security in the server >> is WPA-PSK/WPA2-PSK. >> >> I have two laptops and a desktop wirelessly connected to the router and >> can't change the router security. >> >> How can I resolve the differences in these or is there a trouble >> shooting aid that I can find since no errors are reported anywhere. >> >> TIA, GWB >> > "GWB" <george.barrowcl***@flash.net> wrote in message Very good. It is a networking priciple that you should never have two nics news:IdWBk.809$W06.302@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com... > As it turns out, I had it configured correctly all the time. The problem > was simple: The print server could not support a wired and wireless > connection at the same time. Since I had the wired connection up so I > could monitor and change the encryption, the wireless would connect for > 2-3 seconds and then drop, giving me the impression that there was > something in the security that was not set right. > > Soooooooo, the lesson is: Once the wireless is configured via wired > connection, disconnect the wired connection so wireless can take over. on the same network at the same time (except Nic Teaming deployments). 175767 - Expected Behavior of Multiple Adapters on Same Network http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;175767 -- Phillip Windell www.wandtv.com The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. ----------------------------------------------------- I am writing this letter to ALL Wireless Router manufacturers.
I have a Linksys Wireless Router Model:BEFW11S4. It is 7 years (yes, count them, all of seven little years) old. I have visited the Linksys website numerous times trying to set up the WEP/WPA security on that wireless router (as all responsible wireless router owners should!). I found that there are no links to any wireless router setting websites that are congruent with the screen shots from Linksys' own self help technical support site. I have had to call Linksys several times to resolve this issue only to be placed on hold for lengthy times (sometimes my call was dropped and I had to start over .... how sad for such a large company to have such poorly trained phone receptionists!), then be transferred (see previous comment about the phone receptionists) to a supposed supervisor, only to finally be transferred to someone who tells me that the warranty has expired and wants me to pay $40.00 for the technical support to do the right thing that I want and need to do. First, the device works fine (as evidenced by this e-mail that you have just received)! Second, why should I have to pay for doing the right thing? Third, if I am going to be EXTORTED into buying a new wireless router so that I can do the right thing and set up an encryption key for a secure network, what on Gods' Green Earth makes anyone think that I would CHOOSE to buy another Linksys product when ALL that I have ever received from them is a functional wireless router (yes, even after seven whole years) and the crappiest Customer Service/Technical Support I have ever had the displeasure to encounter! I shall copy this letter and try to find as many Chat Rooms as possible in order to spread the word of ALL that I have gone through with the Chain of Command at the Linksys phone center, well above and beyond what any reasonable person should expect to go through, and still have NO RELIEF concerning my singular issue with their product and its capabilities that I SHOULD be able to enjoy as the owner of said product! What has happend to "The Customer Is Always Right" Customer Service mantra (I can't say "In America" because the call was handled in India)? Is the Customer, the ones that makes the company what it is through the purchase of products, so worthless to the company that they can just be treated with abject contempt and scorn? Is the Customer to thus be trampled underfoot? Are we paying to be so abused? I, for one (yes, one, the beginning of all), shall NOT be treated in such manner, and CERTAINLY shall NOT PAY to be treated as such! In this world of expanding technologies, it shall be those with the GREATEST Customer Appeal that shall continue to be found worthwile in the publics' eyes (and pocketbooks) and shall grow to meet the demands of a growing world - ESPECIALLY in the Electronics Department! It is now my strongest desire that the Linksys Corporation suffers irreparable damage and goes out of business for their Crappy Customer Service! I can only hope that I reach enough people around the world to bring this desire true! Show quoteHide quote "Phillip Windell" wrote: > "GWB" <george.barrowcl***@flash.net> wrote in message > news:IdWBk.809$W06.302@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com... > > As it turns out, I had it configured correctly all the time. The problem > > was simple: The print server could not support a wired and wireless > > connection at the same time. Since I had the wired connection up so I > > could monitor and change the encryption, the wireless would connect for > > 2-3 seconds and then drop, giving me the impression that there was > > something in the security that was not set right. > > > > Soooooooo, the lesson is: Once the wireless is configured via wired > > connection, disconnect the wired connection so wireless can take over. > > Very good. It is a networking priciple that you should never have two nics > on the same network at the same time (except Nic Teaming deployments). > > 175767 - Expected Behavior of Multiple Adapters on Same Network > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;175767 > > -- > Phillip Windell > www.wandtv.com > > The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft, > or anyone else associated with me, including my cats. > ----------------------------------------------------- > > >
Re: creating a wifi zone in my house
RE: Newbie - wireless internet question RE: XP loses wireless connection when rebooting Re: XP loses wireless connection when rebooting RE: combination wired and wireless workgroup? Re: combination wired and wireless workgroup? RE: Wireless Network and Xbox Re: Wireless Network and Xbox Re: Server 2003 RE: Server 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||