|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling my soul to the devil is the next step...The problem is that PC1 can not see PC2; PC3 can see PC2; PC1 can see PC3. To get stuff to PC2, I had to send it via PC3. It is not quite as simple as that though. That was the case last night before I tried some further fixes after some Googling. The hardware seems to be okay. I can ping 127.0.0.1 on all PCs. Running ipconfig /all shows all data matching. I have run the Networking wizard on PCs 1&2 without it making any difference, rebooting after each time. TCP/IP stacks have been rebuilt using an MS tool from here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299357/. No firewalls active on the LAN. I have also repaired the LAN connections. Every parameter that I can think of has been checked and seems to be the same on each PC. All permissions are set to full with the same username on all PCs. PC 1+3 are NTFS and PC2 is FAT32 I changed the cables around at the back of my router without changing the affected PCs. In fact, I cannot find anything that has changed and the LAN has worked well for months. On PC2 clicking on My network Places > MSoft Windows Network > Mshome produces a dialogue box which says that the list of servers for this workgroup is not available. There is quite a delay before Mshome appears. Doing the same on PC1 and PC3 shows both PC1 and PC3. However, a shortcut to PC2 is present on PC3 (actual location C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\NetHood) which does give full access. Transferring this shortcut to PC1 does not give access to PC2. Occasionally, an entry for PC2 does show under Mshome, but clicking on it produces an error saying the network path not being found. The diagnostic problem is that one PC is not completely borked. It would be easier to fix than the current situation. Thank you for reading the above ramblings and hope that they make enough sense for somebody to point me in the right direction. I'm completely stumped. Selling my soul to 'the horned one' is my next step! TIA. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. Try a static IP on all 2 machines and setting up a host file in the
windows directory with the information on all 3 computers. Tony Dr Teeth wrote: Show quoteHide quote > I have three PCs on my LAN, all running Win XP SP2 fully patched. > > The problem is that PC1 can not see PC2; PC3 can see PC2; PC1 can see > PC3. To get stuff to PC2, I had to send it via PC3. It is not quite as > simple as that though. That was the case last night before I tried > some further fixes after some Googling. > > The hardware seems to be okay. I can ping 127.0.0.1 on all PCs. > > Running ipconfig /all shows all data matching. I have run the > Networking wizard on PCs 1&2 without it making any difference, > rebooting after each time. > > TCP/IP stacks have been rebuilt using an MS tool from here > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299357/. > > No firewalls active on the LAN. > > I have also repaired the LAN connections. > > Every parameter that I can think of has been checked and seems to be > the same on each PC. > > All permissions are set to full with the same username on all PCs. PC > 1+3 are NTFS and PC2 is FAT32 > > I changed the cables around at the back of my router without changing > the affected PCs. > > In fact, I cannot find anything that has changed and the LAN has > worked well for months. > > On PC2 clicking on My network Places > MSoft Windows Network > Mshome > produces a dialogue box which says that the list of servers for this > workgroup is not available. There is quite a delay before Mshome > appears. > > Doing the same on PC1 and PC3 shows both PC1 and PC3. However, a > shortcut to PC2 is present on PC3 (actual location C:\Documents and > Settings\<user>\NetHood) which does give full access. Transferring > this shortcut to PC1 does not give access to PC2. > > Occasionally, an entry for PC2 does show under Mshome, but clicking on > it produces an error saying the network path not being found. > > The diagnostic problem is that one PC is not completely borked. It > would be easier to fix than the current situation. > > Thank you for reading the above ramblings and hope that they make > enough sense for somebody to point me in the right direction. I'm > completely stumped. Selling my soul to 'the horned one' is my next > step! > > TIA. > I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Anthony W
<technoj***@yahoo.com> opened his gob and said: >Try a static IP on all 2 machines and setting up a host file in the Hi Tony,>windows directory with the information on all 3 computers. All three PCs have static IPs (sorry did not say so earlier). Could you please give a tad more info on your HOST file idea. The HOST file on all three PCs is identical and their location is C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc on all PCs. The only line (not commented out, natch) is:- 127.0.0.1 localhost. A bit more info, I have found that I cannot disable the LAN connection on PC2, but can on the others. TIA. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:59:42 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Anthony W Guy,><technoj***@yahoo.com> opened his gob and said: > >>Try a static IP on all 2 machines and setting up a host file in the >>windows directory with the information on all 3 computers. > >Hi Tony, > >All three PCs have static IPs (sorry did not say so earlier). Could >you please give a tad more info on your HOST file idea. > >The HOST file on all three PCs is identical and their location is >C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc on all PCs. The only line (not >commented out, natch) is:- >127.0.0.1 localhost. > >A bit more info, I have found that I cannot disable the LAN connection >on PC2, but can on the others. > >TIA. Maybe your symptoms are similar to the other thread. Let's see - why not provide "browstat status", "ipconfig /all", "net config server", and "net config workstation", from each computer, and we may be able to diagnose the problem. Read this article, and linked articles, and follow instructions precisely (download browstat!): <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html#AskingForHelp> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/troubleshooting-network-neighborhood.html#AskingForHelp -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hi Chuck,
I've been out of town for a couple of days. I will get back to you with the info that you requested as soon as I can and I really appreciate your help. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. Hi Chuck,
Here's the info you requested. The node type shows as broadcast on PC 2 as I was trying some troubleshooting myself using your site. I also have an NVidia motherboard here and uninstalled and reinstalled my drivers here without any effect. All Pcs are Win XP Pro, SP2, latest patches applied (i.e. including those from last few days). Sorry, but my Usenet client is word wrapping (line length limited to 70). I have uploaded the files to my web site if you prefer to read them unwrapped; they're here http://www.drteeth.co.uk/lan ------------------------------------------------PC1follows------------------------------------------------------------ Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{8DE02B6D-A536-44EE-B2DA-A74DA54A52E1} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{8DE02B6D-A536-44EE-B2DA-A74DA54A52E1} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{8DE02B6D-A536-44EE-B2DA-A74DA54A52E1} Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : TARDIS_2 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 5: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-F2-4C-D8-87 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.2 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 13:58:10 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 14:58:10 Computer name \\TARDIS_2 Full Computer name TARDIS_2 User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{8DE02B6D-A536-44EE-B2DA-A74DA54A52E1} (0015F24CD887) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain TARDIS_2 COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Server Name \\TARDIS_2 Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{8DE02B6D-A536-44EE-B2DA-A74DA54A52E1} (0015f24cd887) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. -------------------------------------------------PC2 follows--------- Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : laptop Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0A-E4-47-A3-96 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.3 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 14:16:07 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 15:16:07 Computer name \\LAPTOP Full Computer name laptop User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} (000AE447A396) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain LAPTOP COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Server Name \\LAPTOP Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} (000ae447a396) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. ------------------------------PC3 follows---------------------- Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : number_1 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-FC-72-4E-B9 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.4 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 14:06:25 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 14 August 2006 15:06:25 Computer name \\NUMBER_1 Full Computer name number_1 User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} (0050FC724EB9) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain NUMBER_1 COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Server Name \\NUMBER_1 Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} (0050fc724eb9) NetbiosSmb (000000000000) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. Okay Chuck, I hope I have not missed anything out. Needless to say, if anything is not clear, just ask. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:54:35 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >Hi Chuck, The word wrap on Usenet is normal, unfortunately. Thanks for your sensitivity> >Here's the info you requested. The node type shows as broadcast on PC >2 as I was trying some troubleshooting myself using your site. > >I also have an NVidia motherboard here and uninstalled and reinstalled >my drivers here without any effect. > >All Pcs are Win XP Pro, SP2, latest patches applied (i.e. including >those from last few days). > >Sorry, but my Usenet client is word wrapping (line length limited to >70). I have uploaded the files to my web site if you prefer to read >them unwrapped; they're here http://www.drteeth.co.uk/lan though. Now, I will work on this with you, if you wish to continue. But I'll ask you to read my nVidia article, and in particularly the link at the end, which goes to a post in this forum, which refers to a second thread in this forum, that ended just last week. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/hidden-personal-firewall-nvidia-nforce.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/hidden-personal-firewall-nvidia-nforce.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >Now, I will work on this with you, if you wish to continue. But I'll ask you to I have read the article. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the latest>read my nVidia article, and in particularly the link at the end, which goes to a >post in this forum, which refers to a second thread in this forum, that ended >just last week. NVidia drivers and am downloading some previous drivers to see if they will help. I'm just puzzled why the problem is limited to two Pcs ( 1+2) on my LAN whilst PCs 2+3 work 110% normally together. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:30:40 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>Now, I will work on this with you, if you wish to continue. But I'll ask you to >>read my nVidia article, and in particularly the link at the end, which goes to a >>post in this forum, which refers to a second thread in this forum, that ended >>just last week. > >I have read the article. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the latest >NVidia drivers and am downloading some previous drivers to see if they >will help. > >I'm just puzzled why the problem is limited to two Pcs ( 1+2) on my >LAN whilst PCs 2+3 work 110% normally together. Do you have nVidia on the others? Did you read the specific instructions provided by Jack Clarke? -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:30:40 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>Now, I will work on this with you, if you wish to continue. But I'll ask you to >>read my nVidia article, and in particularly the link at the end, which goes to a >>post in this forum, which refers to a second thread in this forum, that ended >>just last week. > >I have read the article. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the latest >NVidia drivers and am downloading some previous drivers to see if they >will help. > >I'm just puzzled why the problem is limited to two Pcs ( 1+2) on my >LAN whilst PCs 2+3 work 110% normally together. Did you read the specific instructions provided by Jack Clarke? I see that Laptop and Number_1 both use Realtek. This makes me stronger suspect that the problem starts with nVidia. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >Did you read the specific instructions provided by Jack Clarke? I did not see any specific instructions from Jack. It's not just hishead that was spinning. >I see that Laptop and Number_1 both use Realtek. This makes me stronger suspect I have taken the nVidia completely out of the equation by uninstalling>that the problem starts with nVidia. the NV LAN drivers *and* disabling it in the BIOS. I installed a spare Realtek card that I had hanging around and the result is the same. Using the stock MSoft drivers ATM, about to update to latest Realtek ones. I shall keep things that way until things get sorted. One thing that I have noticed with the PC2 (laptop) is that it is not possible to disable the LAN connection. The 'error disabling connection' box says that one or more protocols may be used that do not support plug-and-play or it may have been initiated by another user or account. This does not explain why PC3 can interact okay with laptop though. TIA. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Dr Teeth
<no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com> opened his gob and said: >I did not see any specific instructions from Jack. It's not just his Sorry for replying to myself. Chuck, Jacks comments did not apply as I>head that was spinning. never installed NVIDIA Firewall and Forceware Network Access Manager. During a recent uninstall and reinstall of the drivers as a result of your thread with Jack, I made doubly sure that these bits did not get installed. A tad academic now as I'm Realtek powered <g>. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:15:02 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Dr Teeth Guy,><no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com> opened his gob and said: > >>I did not see any specific instructions from Jack. It's not just his >>head that was spinning. > >Sorry for replying to myself. Chuck, Jacks comments did not apply as I >never installed NVIDIA Firewall and Forceware Network >Access Manager. During a recent uninstall and reinstall of the drivers >as a result of your thread with Jack, I made doubly sure that these >bits did not get installed. > >A tad academic now as I'm Realtek powered <g>. I don't think you quite got the experience that Jack related. He installed (or un installed) drivers, but the drivers for the nVidia NIC were not the problem. The problem was the firewall itself. And if you look upwards in the thread, you'll see that I had him enumerate the winsock, as many firewalls are installed with links in the LSP / Winsock. But no trace of the firewall was seen there. So you may state that you're nVidia free, and maybe you are. But be very sure, because Jack was sure for several days. And found out that he had been wrong, and found nVidia to be the problem. Anyway, it's your computer. I'm not looking at it with you. So if the problem isn't the NIC, what's the problem? Let's look at the updated diagnostics, to start. I install a network diagnostics script, ccdiag.cmd, on each of my computers, something like @echo off @echo Start CCDiag for %computername% >c:\ccdiag.txt ipconfig /all >>c:\ccdiag.txt browstat status >>c:\ccdiag.txt net config server >>c:\ccdiag.txt net config workstation >>c:\ccdiag.txt net share >>c:\ccdiag.txt net view >>c:\ccdiag.txt @echo End CCDiag for %computername% >>c:\ccdiag.txt notepad c:\ccdiag.txt Yet another PChuck script. Maybe it will help us though. I run CCDiag periodically, when something funky is happening. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/command-window.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/06/command-window.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hi Chuck,
>So you may state that you're nVidia free, and maybe you are. But be very sure, Even though sure I'm nVidia free [this PC is 6 months old and I have>because Jack was sure for several days. And found out that he had been wrong, >and found nVidia to be the problem. never installed the firewall software only the ethernet drivers], I enumerated the TCP/IP stack twice. Once using the command line on your site and once using the software from MSKB 299357. I had previously used WinSock XP Fix 1.2.exe as well (before we 'met'). >Anyway, it's your computer. I'm not looking at it with you. So if the problem I realise that it is important that I follow a logical route for you>isn't the NIC, what's the problem? to be able to help me, so I will always do what you ask. I did notice earlier today that PC1 and PC2 would not show any servers under the workgroup name *unless* PC3 was switched on. A red herring or vital clue <g>? The text of the various ccdiag files are posted below as well as on my web site www.drteeth.co.uk/lan, to avoid word-wrap. -----------------PC1---------------------- Start CCDiag for TARDIS_2 Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : TARDIS_2 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type .. . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . .. . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : NoEthernet adapter Local Area Connection 6: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-FC-72-4E-BC Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . .. . . . . : 192.168.1.2 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . .. . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . .. . . : 15 August 2006 20:20:41 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . .. : 15 August 2006 21:20:41 Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} Server Name \\TARDIS_2 Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} (0050fc724ebc) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. Computer name \\TARDIS_2 Full Computer name TARDIS_2 User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} (0050FC724EBC) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain TARDIS_2 COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E$ E:\ Default share IPC$ Remote IPC D$ D:\ Default share C$ C:\ Default share print$ C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers Printer Drivers ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin Y$ Y:\ Default share F$ F:\ Default share SharedDocs C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ALL USERS\DOCUMENTS Tardis-2 D D:\ test_F F:\ Printer FaxModem (Photo Qualit Spooled Print to this device to send a pho Printer2 FaxModem Spooled Print to this device to send a fax Printer3 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 USB001 Spooled Canon i865 The command completed successfully. Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. End CCDiag for TARDIS_2 ----------------PC2----------------------------- Start CCDiag for LAPTOP Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : laptop Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . .. . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . .. . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : NoEthernet adapter Local Area Connection 2: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0A-E4-47-A3-96 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . .. . . . . : 192.168.1.3 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . .. . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . .. . . : 15 August 2006 20:24:54 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . .. : 15 August 2006 21:24:54 Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} Server Name \\LAPTOP Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} (000ae447a396) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. Computer name \\LAPTOP Full Computer name laptop User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{B267792A-DF96-41C7-A3CF-3E84C1FE17A0} (000AE447A396) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain LAPTOP COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C$ C:\ Default share ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin IPC$ Remote IPC Laptop C:\ SharedDocs C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents The command completed successfully. Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. End CCDiag for LAPTOP ---------------------------PC3-------------------- Start CCDiag for NUMBER_1 Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : number_1 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type .. . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . .. . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : NoEthernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet NIC Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-FC-72-4E-B9 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . .. . . . . : 192.168.1.4 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 DNS Servers . .. . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . .. . . : 15 August 2006 20:25:29 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . .. : 15 August 2006 21:25:29 Status for domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: NUMBER_1 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master NUMBER_1 \\NUMBER_1 There are 3 servers in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} There are 1 domains in domain WORKGROUP on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} Server Name \\NUMBER_1 Server Comment Software version Windows 2002 Server is active on NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} (0050fc724eb9) NetbiosSmb (000000000000) Server hidden No Maximum Logged On Users 10 Maximum open files per session 16384 Idle session time (min) 15 The command completed successfully. Computer name \\NUMBER_1 Full Computer name number_1 User name Guy Workstation active on NetbiosSmb (000000000000) NetBT_Tcpip_{0DDD7A71-7618-4064-B188-E300B56CA41A} (0050FC724EB9) Software version Windows 2002 Workstation domain WORKGROUP Workstation Domain DNS Name (null) Logon domain NUMBER_1 COM Open Timeout (sec) 0 COM Send Count (byte) 16 COM Send Timeout (msec) 250 The command completed successfully. Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IPC$ Remote IPC print$ C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers Printer Drivers ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin C$ C:\ Default share DVD on 1 H:\ Number_1 C:\ WinXP-NTFS SharedDocs C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ALL USERS\DOCUMENTS EPSON R300 USB001 Spooled EPSON R300 Printer Microsoft Document Ima Spooled Microsoft Office Document Image Wr The command completed successfully. Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. End CCDiag for NUMBER_1 TIA. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:21:47 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >Hi Chuck, Guy,> >>So you may state that you're nVidia free, and maybe you are. But be very sure, >>because Jack was sure for several days. And found out that he had been wrong, >>and found nVidia to be the problem. > >Even though sure I'm nVidia free [this PC is 6 months old and I have >never installed the firewall software only the ethernet drivers], I >enumerated the TCP/IP stack twice. Once using the command line on your >site and once using the software from MSKB 299357. I had previously >used WinSock XP Fix 1.2.exe as well (before we 'met'). > >>Anyway, it's your computer. I'm not looking at it with you. So if the problem >>isn't the NIC, what's the problem? > >I realise that it is important that I follow a logical route for you >to be able to help me, so I will always do what you ask. I did notice >earlier today that PC1 and PC2 would not show any servers under the >workgroup name *unless* PC3 was switched on. A red herring or vital >clue <g>? All 3 computers recognise NUMBER_1 ("PC3") as the master browser, and all 3 computers are recognising each other's presence. The master browser must be on for either TARDIS_2 or LAPTOP to see each other. You could make either TARDIS_2 or LAPTOP a backup browser, but as soon as you were to carry that computer away from the network, so it were to lose connectivity with NUMBER_1, it would elect itself a master browser. You would end up with a workgroup with 2 master browsers, ie a segmented workgroup. Other than that, right now I can see no other problem. Your original problem reported stated that The problem is that PC1 can not see PC2; PC3 can see PC2; PC1 can see PC3. That is but 3 relationships out of 6. How about PC2 to PC1 and PC3, and PC3 to PC1. Check and make sure that NetBT is consistently set on all 3 computers. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/04/netbios-over-tcpip.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/04/netbios-over-tcpip.html Or, if you like, we can do relational analysis. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/using-cdiag-without-assistance.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/using-cdiag-without-assistance.html Take the following code (everything INSIDE the "#####" lines). Please DO NOT include ANY portion of the "#####" lines. (Please verify computer names and ip addresses). 1. Open Notepad. Ensure that Format - Word Wrap is not checked. Highlight then Copy the code (Ctrl-C), precisely as it is presented, and Paste (Ctrl-V) into Notepad. Verify, and correct, names and addresses if necessary. 2. Save the Notepad file as "cdiag.cmd", as type "All Files", into the root folder "C:\". 3. Run it by Start - Run - "c:\cdiag". 4. Wait patiently. 5. When Notepad opens up displaying c:\cdiag.txt, first check Format and ensure that Word Wrap is NOT checked! Then, copy the entire contents (Ctrl-A Ctrl-C) and paste (Ctrl-V) into your next post. Do this from all computers, please, with all computers powered up and online. ##### Start CDiag Assembled Code @echo off set FullTarget1=TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 set FullTarget2=LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 set FullTarget3=NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 set FullTarget4= set FullTargets=%FullTarget1% %FullTarget2% %FullTarget3% %FullTarget4% set FullTargets=%FullTargets% 127.0.0.1 set PingTargets=www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Set Version=V1.40 @echo CDiagnosis %Version% >c:\cdiag.txt @echo Start diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Full Targets %FullTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Ping Targets %PingTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Over All Analysis >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Enumerate Shares >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt net share >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Adhoc Browser View >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt net view >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Full Targets Analysis %FullTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt for %%a in (%FullTargets%) do ( @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Target %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo "%computername% ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo "%computername% net view %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt net view %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt ) @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Ping Targets Analysis %PingTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt for %%a in (%PingTargets%) do ( @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo Target %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo "%computername% ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt ) @echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt @echo End diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt notepad c:\cdiag.txt :EOF ##### End CDiag Assembled Code-- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hi Chuck,
>All 3 computers recognise NUMBER_1 ("PC3") as the master browser, and all 3 How does one make a PC a master browser? I was not aware that such a>computers are recognising each other's presence. The master browser must be on >for either TARDIS_2 or LAPTOP to see each other. You could make either TARDIS_2 >or LAPTOP a backup browser, but as soon as you were to carry that computer away >from the network, so it were to lose connectivity with NUMBER_1, it would elect >itself a master browser. You would end up with a workgroup with 2 master >browsers, ie a segmented workgroup. > >Other than that, right now I can see no other problem. thing existed and am sure (as much as I can be at any rate) that any two of my PCs could be on and connect/interact 100% with each other, i.e. a 'master' was not needed. >Your original problem reported stated that The problem is that PC1 can not see Not exactly correct. PC1 can see both PC2 and PC3. It can only browse>PC2; PC3 can see PC2; PC1 can see PC3. That is but 3 relationships out of 6. >How about PC2 to PC1 and PC3, and PC3 to PC1. PC3, trying to browse PC2 results in an error, screen captured here: www.drteeth.co.uk/lan/LANerror.jpg. This also happens when PC2 tries to connect to PC1; again, the name of the PC is visible. I have uploaded a diagram of the problem, www.drteeth.co.uk/lan/LANprob.jpg. >Check and make sure that NetBT is consistently set on all 3 computers. I can confirm that it is set to 'enabled' on all PCs, I changed themall from the default. Here's the outputs of the cdiag.txt files, as usual, I have uploaded them to my site. In future, do you prefer files here (word-wrapped) or au naturelle on my web site? -----------------PC1------------------------------- CDiagnosis V1.40 Start diagnosis for TARDIS_2 Full Targets TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Ping Targets www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Over All Analysis Enumerate Shares Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E$ E:\ Default share IPC$ Remote IPC D$ D:\ Default share Y$ Y:\ Default share print$ C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers Printer Drivers ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin C$ C:\ Default share F$ F:\ Default share SharedDocs C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ALL USERS\DOCUMENTS Tardis-2 D D:\ Printer FaxModem (Photo Qualit Spooled Print to this device to send a pho Printer2 FaxModem Spooled Print to this device to send a fax Printer3 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 USB001 Spooled Canon i865 The command completed successfully. Adhoc Browser View Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. Full Targets Analysis TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Target TARDIS_2 "TARDIS_2 ping TARDIS_2" Pinging TARDIS_2 [192.168.1.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view TARDIS_2" Shared resources at TARDIS_2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.2 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.2" Pinging 192.168.1.2 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.2" Shared resources at 192.168.1.2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target LAPTOP "TARDIS_2 ping LAPTOP" Ping request could not find host LAPTOP. Please check the name and try again. "TARDIS_2 net view LAPTOP" Target 192.168.1.3 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.3" Pinging 192.168.1.3 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.3" Target NUMBER_1 "TARDIS_2 ping NUMBER_1" Pinging NUMBER_1 [192.168.1.4] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view NUMBER_1" Shared resources at NUMBER_1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.4 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.4" Shared resources at 192.168.1.4 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 127.0.0.1 "TARDIS_2 ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Ping Targets Analysis www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Target www.yahoo.com "TARDIS_2 ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [209.73.186.238] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=54 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 209.73.186.238: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 108ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = 112ms Target 66.94.230.32 "TARDIS_2 ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 179ms, Maximum = 181ms, Average = 180ms Target 192.168.1.254 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.254" Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms End diagnosis for TARDIS_2 --------------------------------PC2----------------------- CDiagnosis V1.40 Start diagnosis for TARDIS_2 Full Targets TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Ping Targets www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Over All Analysis Enumerate Shares Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E$ E:\ Default share IPC$ Remote IPC D$ D:\ Default share Y$ Y:\ Default share print$ C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers Printer Drivers ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin C$ C:\ Default share F$ F:\ Default share SharedDocs C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ALL USERS\DOCUMENTS Tardis-2 D D:\ Printer FaxModem (Photo Qualit Spooled Print to this device to send a pho Printer2 FaxModem Spooled Print to this device to send a fax Printer3 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 LPT1: Spooled Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 USB001 Spooled Canon i865 The command completed successfully. Adhoc Browser View Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. Full Targets Analysis TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Target TARDIS_2 "TARDIS_2 ping TARDIS_2" Pinging TARDIS_2 [192.168.1.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view TARDIS_2" Shared resources at TARDIS_2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.2 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.2" Pinging 192.168.1.2 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.2" Shared resources at 192.168.1.2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target LAPTOP "TARDIS_2 ping LAPTOP" Ping request could not find host LAPTOP. Please check the name and try again. "TARDIS_2 net view LAPTOP" Target 192.168.1.3 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.3" Pinging 192.168.1.3 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.3" Target NUMBER_1 "TARDIS_2 ping NUMBER_1" Pinging NUMBER_1 [192.168.1.4] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view NUMBER_1" Shared resources at NUMBER_1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.4 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 192.168.1.4" Shared resources at 192.168.1.4 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 127.0.0.1 "TARDIS_2 ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "TARDIS_2 net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Ping Targets Analysis www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Target www.yahoo.com "TARDIS_2 ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [209.73.186.238] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=54 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 209.73.186.238: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 108ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = 112ms Target 66.94.230.32 "TARDIS_2 ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 179ms, Maximum = 181ms, Average = 180ms Target 192.168.1.254 "TARDIS_2 ping 192.168.1.254" Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms End diagnosis for TARDIS_2 ------------------------------PC3------------------------ CDiagnosis V1.40 Start diagnosis for NUMBER_1 Full Targets TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Ping Targets www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Over All Analysis Enumerate Shares Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IPC$ Remote IPC print$ C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers Printer Drivers ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin C$ C:\ Default share DVD on 1 H:\ Number_1 C:\ WinXP-NTFS SharedDocs C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ALL USERS\DOCUMENTS EPSON R300 USB001 Spooled EPSON R300 Printer Microsoft Document Ima Spooled Microsoft Office Document Image Wr The command completed successfully. Adhoc Browser View Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. Full Targets Analysis TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Target TARDIS_2 "NUMBER_1 ping TARDIS_2" Pinging TARDIS_2 [192.168.1.2] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view TARDIS_2" Shared resources at TARDIS_2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.2 "NUMBER_1 ping 192.168.1.2" Pinging 192.168.1.2 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.2: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 3ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view 192.168.1.2" Shared resources at 192.168.1.2 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Printer Print Print to this device to send a photo quality fax. Printer2 Print Print to this device to send a fax. Printer3 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series PCL 6 Printer4 Print Samsung ML-2250 Series Printer5 Print Canon i865 SharedDocs Disk Tardis-2 D Disk The command completed successfully. Target LAPTOP "NUMBER_1 ping LAPTOP" Pinging LAPTOP [192.168.1.3] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view LAPTOP" Shared resources at LAPTOP Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laptop Disk SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.3 "NUMBER_1 ping 192.168.1.3" Pinging 192.168.1.3 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view 192.168.1.3" Shared resources at 192.168.1.3 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laptop Disk SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target NUMBER_1 "NUMBER_1 ping NUMBER_1" Pinging number_1 [192.168.1.4] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view NUMBER_1" Shared resources at NUMBER_1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.4 "NUMBER_1 ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view 192.168.1.4" Shared resources at 192.168.1.4 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 127.0.0.1 "NUMBER_1 ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "NUMBER_1 net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Ping Targets Analysis www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Target www.yahoo.com "NUMBER_1 ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [209.73.186.238] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=54 Ping statistics for 209.73.186.238: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 103ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 110ms Target 66.94.230.32 "NUMBER_1 ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Request timed out. Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 180ms, Maximum = 181ms, Average = 180ms Target 192.168.1.254 "NUMBER_1 ping 192.168.1.254" Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms End diagnosis for NUMBER_1 Thanks for your continued support. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:12:26 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >Hi Chuck, Guy,> >>All 3 computers recognise NUMBER_1 ("PC3") as the master browser, and all 3 >>computers are recognising each other's presence. The master browser must be on >>for either TARDIS_2 or LAPTOP to see each other. You could make either TARDIS_2 >>or LAPTOP a backup browser, but as soon as you were to carry that computer away >>from the network, so it were to lose connectivity with NUMBER_1, it would elect >>itself a master browser. You would end up with a workgroup with 2 master >>browsers, ie a segmented workgroup. >> >>Other than that, right now I can see no other problem. > >How does one make a PC a master browser? I was not aware that such a >thing existed and am sure (as much as I can be at any rate) that any >two of my PCs could be on and connect/interact 100% with each other, >i.e. a 'master' was not needed. > >>Your original problem reported stated that The problem is that PC1 can not see >>PC2; PC3 can see PC2; PC1 can see PC3. That is but 3 relationships out of 6. >>How about PC2 to PC1 and PC3, and PC3 to PC1. > >Not exactly correct. PC1 can see both PC2 and PC3. It can only browse >PC3, trying to browse PC2 results in an error, screen captured here: >www.drteeth.co.uk/lan/LANerror.jpg. This also happens when PC2 tries >to connect to PC1; again, the name of the PC is visible. I have >uploaded a diagram of the problem, www.drteeth.co.uk/lan/LANprob.jpg. > >>Check and make sure that NetBT is consistently set on all 3 computers. > >I can confirm that it is set to 'enabled' on all PCs, I changed them >all from the default. > >Here's the outputs of the cdiag.txt files, as usual, I have uploaded >them to my site. In future, do you prefer files here (word-wrapped) or >au naturelle on my web site? Attached here is fine, generally. Google will provide this for us, with no problem. But you could provide us CDiag log for Laptop, instead of for TARDIS_2 twice. Now the browser issue, and master browser elections, are a lot of fun to deal with. The NT browser is a peer-peer service, with a master browser being elected by all of the computers running the browser service. Master browser conflicts arise when more than one computer elects itself a master browser. Or sometimes there is no browser to become the master browser. Read my article for details please. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/04/nt-browser-or-why-cant-i-always-see.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >But you could provide us CDiag log for Laptop, instead of for TARDIS_2 twice. I wondered when I'd get caught out with that one! here's CDiag log forLaptop:- CDiagnosis V1.40 Start diagnosis for LAPTOP Full Targets TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Ping Targets www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Over All Analysis Enumerate Shares Share name Resource Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C$ C:\ Default share ADMIN$ C:\WINDOWS Remote Admin IPC$ Remote IPC Laptop C:\ SharedDocs C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents The command completed successfully. Adhoc Browser View Server Name Remark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \\LAPTOP \\NUMBER_1 \\TARDIS_2 The command completed successfully. Full Targets Analysis TARDIS_2 192.168.1.2 LAPTOP 192.168.1.3 NUMBER_1 192.168.1.4 127.0.0.1 Target TARDIS_2 "LAPTOP ping TARDIS_2" Ping request could not find host TARDIS_2. Please check the name and try again. "LAPTOP net view TARDIS_2" Target 192.168.1.2 "LAPTOP ping 192.168.1.2" Pinging 192.168.1.2 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.2: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), "LAPTOP net view 192.168.1.2" Target LAPTOP "LAPTOP ping LAPTOP" Pinging laptop [192.168.1.3] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "LAPTOP net view LAPTOP" Shared resources at LAPTOP Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laptop Disk SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.3 "LAPTOP ping 192.168.1.3" Pinging 192.168.1.3 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "LAPTOP net view 192.168.1.3" Shared resources at 192.168.1.3 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laptop Disk SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target NUMBER_1 "LAPTOP ping NUMBER_1" Pinging NUMBER_1 [192.168.1.4] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "LAPTOP net view NUMBER_1" Shared resources at NUMBER_1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 192.168.1.4 "LAPTOP ping 192.168.1.4" Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.1.4: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "LAPTOP net view 192.168.1.4" Shared resources at 192.168.1.4 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DVD on 1 Disk EPSON R300 Print EPSON R300 Number_1 Disk WinXP-NTFS Printer Print Microsoft Office Document Image Writer SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Target 127.0.0.1 "LAPTOP ping 127.0.0.1" Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms "LAPTOP net view 127.0.0.1" Shared resources at 127.0.0.1 Share name Type Used as Comment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laptop Disk SharedDocs Disk The command completed successfully. Ping Targets Analysis www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.254 Target www.yahoo.com "LAPTOP ping www.yahoo.com" Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [209.73.186.238] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=54 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=54 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.73.186.238: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 209.73.186.238: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 118ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 118ms Target 66.94.230.32 "LAPTOP ping 66.94.230.32" Pinging 66.94.230.32 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=51 Reply from 66.94.230.32: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=51 Ping statistics for 66.94.230.32: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 179ms, Maximum = 192ms, Average = 182ms Target 192.168.1.254 "LAPTOP ping 192.168.1.254" Pinging 192.168.1.254 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 192.168.1.254: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms End diagnosis for LAPTOP Hope it helps. Thanks. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:23:09 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck <SNIP>><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>But you could provide us CDiag log for Laptop, instead of for TARDIS_2 twice. > >I wondered when I'd get caught out with that one! here's CDiag log for >Laptop:- >Hope it helps. That it does. The problem - and it's symmetrical - is between LAPTOP and> >Thanks. TARDIS_2. Neither can access the other, in any of 4 tests each. Look at CDiag for LAPTOP, Target TARDIS_2. Look at CDiag for TARDIS_2, Target LAPTOP. # Ping by name. Name resolution problem. # Net View by name. No display (you'll probably see errors in the command window). # Ping by IP address. Request times out. # Net View by IP address. No display (you'll probably see errors in the command window). With pings being blocked, both ways, this points to either a physical (cabling / router) or logical (firewall) problem. Let's test logically, and do this very methodically please. Read thru instructions first. 1) Swap router ports for 2 cables - say NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP. See if the problem moves. 2) Swap router ports for NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP back, then swap NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2. See if the problem moves. 3) Swap router ports for NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2 back, then swap Ethernet cables between NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP. See if the problem moves. 4) Swap Ethernet cables for NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP back, then swap NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2. See if the problem moves. Tests 1 - 4 will identify either a router port or Ethernet cable as the problem. If no changes are observed from any of the 4 tests, then the problem will be a firewall. Or possibly a LSP / Winsock problem, but with the symmetry, I don't believe that. If it's a firewall, we'll think of some more tests. Just do this very deliberately. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hi Chuck,
>Tests 1 - 4 will identify either a router port or Ethernet cable as the problem. None of the tests made any difference to the problem at all. SpyBot>If no changes are observed from any of the 4 tests, then the problem will be a >firewall. Or possibly a LSP / Winsock problem, but with the symmetry, I don't >believe that. S&D has a facility to examine LSP/Winsocks and nothing strange (to my eyes) was there. The Laptop, PC2, seemed to have more protocols though, but all referenced the same MSoft DLL. Screenies can be uploaded to my site. >If it's a firewall, we'll think of some more tests. Just do this very Firewalls have been installed on the laptop, but are fully>deliberately. disabled...uninstalled and running services checked. But obviously, am happy to run whatever tests you advise. The symmetry of this problem has bothered me all along <g>. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:59:47 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >Hi Chuck, Please don't do screenies, do texties, and post here. Start with LSP / Winsock> >>Tests 1 - 4 will identify either a router port or Ethernet cable as the problem. >>If no changes are observed from any of the 4 tests, then the problem will be a >>firewall. Or possibly a LSP / Winsock problem, but with the symmetry, I don't >>believe that. > >None of the tests made any difference to the problem at all. SpyBot >S&D has a facility to examine LSP/Winsocks and nothing strange (to my >eyes) was there. The Laptop, PC2, seemed to have more protocols >though, but all referenced the same MSoft DLL. Screenies can be >uploaded to my site. > >>If it's a firewall, we'll think of some more tests. Just do this very >>deliberately. > >Firewalls have been installed on the laptop, but are fully >disabled...uninstalled and running services checked. But obviously, am >happy to run whatever tests you advise. > >The symmetry of this problem has bothered me all along <g>. enumerations, for Windows XP SP2 simply "netsh winsock show catalog". <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/03/lsp-winsock-analysis-using-netsh.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/03/lsp-winsock-analysis-using-netsh.html What firewalls are "disabled"? Google in this forum for folks who have problems even with firewalls "disabled". <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/your-personal-firewall-can-either-help.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/your-personal-firewall-can-either-help.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >What firewalls are "disabled"? Zonealarm free...uninstalled and double check for running services [aknown issue even after uninstall]. Kerio, similarly uninstalled and checked for running services. Both on Laptop (PC2 only). PC1 has never had a firewall installed either of the software variety or nVidia's hardware one. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:23:09 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck <SNIP>><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>But you could provide us CDiag log for Laptop, instead of for TARDIS_2 twice. > >I wondered when I'd get caught out with that one! here's CDiag log for >Laptop:- >Hope it helps. That it does. The problem - and it's symmetrical - is between LAPTOP and> >Thanks. TARDIS_2. Neither can access the other, in any of 4 tests each. Look at CDiag for LAPTOP, Target TARDIS_2. Look at CDiag for TARDIS_2, Target LAPTOP. # Ping by name. Name resolution problem. # Net View by name. No display (you'll probably see errors in the command window). # Ping by IP address. Request times out. # Net View by IP address. No display (you'll probably see errors in the command window). With pings being blocked, both ways, this points to either a physical (cabling / router) or logical (firewall) problem. Let's test logically, and do this very methodically please. Read thru instructions first. 1) Swap router ports for 2 cables - say NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP. See if the problem moves. 2) Swap router ports for NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP back, then swap NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2. See if the problem moves. 3) Swap router ports for NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2 back, then swap Ethernet cables between NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP. See if the problem moves. 4) Swap Ethernet cables for NUMBER_1 and LAPTOP back, then swap NUMBER_1 and TARDIS_2. See if the problem moves. Tests 1 - 4 will identify either a router port or Ethernet cable as the problem. If no changes are observed from any of the 4 tests, then the problem will be a firewall. Or possibly a LSP / Winsock problem, but with the symmetry, I don't believe that. If it's a firewall, we'll think of some more tests. Just do this very deliberately. And your testing, as you swap cables and / or router ports, can be very simple. From Tardis_2, open one command window, and type "ping -t 192.168.1.3" (Ping Laptop by IP address). Then open a second command window, and type "ping -t 192.168.1.4" (Ping Number_1 by IP address). Do the same for the other two computers, but differing targets. The "ping -t" will ping continuously, and you won't have to restart anything. See instantly when you make a change that makes the problem move. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >And your testing, as you swap cables and / or router ports, can be very simple. I'll run the tests again. Previously, I just tried to browse the>From Tardis_2, open one command window, and type "ping -t 192.168.1.3" (Ping >Laptop by IP address). Then open a second command window, and type "ping -t >192.168.1.4" (Ping Number_1 by IP address). Do the same for the other two >computers, but differing targets. The "ping -t" will ping continuously, and you >won't have to restart anything. See instantly when you make a change that makes >the problem move. various shares. I've got to the stage where I'm prepared to partition my h/ds on PCs 1+2 and use a vanilla install of XP for testing...I hate it when technology wins [though it hasn't yet]. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >And your testing, as you swap cables and / or router ports, can be very simple. Neat idea, but nothing made any difference. I did notice that pinging>From Tardis_2, open one command window, and type "ping -t 192.168.1.3" (Ping >Laptop by IP address). Then open a second command window, and type "ping -t >192.168.1.4" (Ping Number_1 by IP address). Do the same for the other two >computers, but differing targets. The "ping -t" will ping continuously, and you >won't have to restart anything. See instantly when you make a change that makes >the problem move. TARDIS_2 from Laptop produced a 'request timed out' error. Pinging in the other direction produced a 'destination unreachable error'. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. Hi Chuck,
I've fixed it, but you probably won't be happy with my solution. I am not as we should have been able to get things to work 'properly'. I did partition the disk on Laptop (PC2) and reinstalled win XP. Nada! The solution, I installed NetBEUI on all PCs on the network. I'd still like to know what was FUBAR in the first place though. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:26:45 +0100, Dr Teeth
<no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com> wrote: >Hi Chuck, As you may remember, we communicated about my similar problem, which> >I've fixed it, but you probably won't be happy with my solution. I am >not as we should have been able to get things to work 'properly'. > >I did partition the disk on Laptop (PC2) and reinstalled win XP. Nada! > >The solution, I installed NetBEUI on all PCs on the network. I'd still >like to know what was FUBAR in the first place though. Doc Chuck helped me step through with a lengthy thread. I apologize for not knowing the details of your own problem, but I did post details of my solution in this group on 8/13, under the heading "NVIDIA hidden firewall..." I hope this may help you. Best regards, Jack I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when JClark
<jclark@nomail.invalid> opened his gob and said: >Doc Hi Jack,>As you may remember, we communicated about my similar problem, which >Chuck helped me step through with a lengthy thread. I apologize for >not knowing the details of your own problem, but I did post details >of my solution in this group on 8/13, under the heading "NVIDIA >hidden firewall..." >I hope this may help you. >Best regards, > >Jack Many thanks for visiting this thread with your info. I followed 'your' thread with interest. The issue of the firewall has been mentioned and it is not present on my system...I always declined nVidia's offer and always installed just the ethernet drivers. No firewalls or their services or hooks into LSP/TCP stack are present. Though things are basically fixed here, it is very frustrating not knowing what the real problem is and fixing that <g>. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:21:03 +0100, Dr Teeth
<no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when JClark I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, but my point was that I was><jclark@nomail.invalid> opened his gob and said: > >>Doc >>As you may remember, we communicated about my similar problem, which >>Chuck helped me step through with a lengthy thread. I apologize for >>not knowing the details of your own problem, but I did post details >>of my solution in this group on 8/13, under the heading "NVIDIA >>hidden firewall..." >>I hope this may help you. >>Best regards, >> >>Jack > >Hi Jack, > >Many thanks for visiting this thread with your info. I followed 'your' >thread with interest. > >The issue of the firewall has been mentioned and it is not present on >my system...I always declined nVidia's offer and always installed just >the ethernet drivers. No firewalls or their services or hooks into >LSP/TCP stack are present. > >Though things are basically fixed here, it is very frustrating not >knowing what the real problem is and fixing that <g>. Hi Guy, sure, really sure I didn't have the NVIDIA firewall either, but it was there, hidden in the Network Access Manager, a separate program from the "NVIDIA drivers". So just a friendly reminder to check under add\remove programs to be sure Network Access Manager isn't on your system either. As an aside, I remember hearing bad things about NETBUI, but I'm too ignorant to remember what they were and too tired to research it. Perhaps Chuck will enlighten us both on the subject. Best regards and good luck. Jack On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:26:45 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >Hi Chuck, If using NetBEUI solved the problem, then the problem was, most likely, the> >I've fixed it, but you probably won't be happy with my solution. I am >not as we should have been able to get things to work 'properly'. > >I did partition the disk on Laptop (PC2) and reinstalled win XP. Nada! > >The solution, I installed NetBEUI on all PCs on the network. I'd still >like to know what was FUBAR in the first place though. firewall (or an LSP / Winsock fix not tried). If nVidia hardware was involved, then there is the problem. When you install the nVidia drivers, you install some component that blocks SMBs. If you're still very frustrated not knowing what the real problem is, then that's why. If you continue to feel frustrated, let us know. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >If you continue to feel frustrated, let us know. Oh I am <g>.>If using NetBEUI solved the problem, then the problem was, most How can this affect the comms between only one PC and not all? I would>likely, the firewall (or an LSP / Winsock fix not tried). have exacted all comms with my nVidia PC to be affected. Here's the output of 'netsh winsock show catalog' that you asked me to do. Run on PC1 only, the one with the nVidia board. I have 'refreshed' or rebuilt the winsock at least twice...after installing my Realtek network card. Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1001 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1002 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [RAW/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1003 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 3 Protocol: 0 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP UDP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1012 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP TCP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1013 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] SEQPACKET 4 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1014 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -4 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] DATAGRAM 4 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1015 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -4 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] SEQPACKET 5 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1016 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -5 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] DATAGRAM 5 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1017 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -5 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_NdisWanNbfOut{5203C91D-6274-4523-9EDF-4372EFA5A4EB}] SEQPACKET 6 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1018 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\Nbf_NdisWanNbfOut{5203C91D-6274-4523-9EDF-4372EFA5A4EB}] DATAGRAM 6 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1019 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] SEQPACKET 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1020 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] DATAGRAM 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1021 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] SEQPACKET 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1022 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] DATAGRAM 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1023 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{83B38E2B-D649-4AF9-89B9-319D34AA386A}] SEQPACKET 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1024 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{83B38E2B-D649-4AF9-89B9-319D34AA386A}] DATAGRAM 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1025 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{881D645F-12DC-4C23-B008-7D423AF37EF0}] SEQPACKET 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1026 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{881D645F-12DC-4C23-B008-7D423AF37EF0}] DATAGRAM 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1027 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Tcpip Provider ID: {22059D40-7E9E-11CF-AE5A-00AA00A7112B} Name Space: 12 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: NTDS Provider ID: {3B2637EE-E580-11CF-A555-00C04FD8D4AC} Name Space: 32 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Network Location Awareness (NLA) Namespace Provider ID: {6642243A-3BA8-4AA6-BAA5-2E0BD71FDD83} Name Space: 15 Active: 1 Version: 0 -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. Hi Chuck,
I'd be grateful if you could look over the output of 'netsh winsock show catalog' in my previous message. TIA. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:48:08 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >Hi Chuck, Hi Guy,> >I'd be grateful if you could look over the output of 'netsh winsock >show catalog' in my previous message. > >TIA. I'll use the Winsock enumeration from my one workgroup computer, which has no special network components. This is pretty close to baseline. ####### Start Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1001 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1002 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [RAW/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1003 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 3 Protocol: 0 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP UDP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1004 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP TCP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1005 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{17977DB7-58BE-4500-B84B-304D9D82FD31}] SEQPACKET 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1038 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{17977DB7-58BE-4500-B84B-304D9D82FD31}] DATAGRAM 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1039 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{3B6F355E-0FDE-4618-8E02-725904C9E32E}] SEQPACKET 4 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1040 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -4 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{3B6F355E-0FDE-4618-8E02-725904C9E32E}] DATAGRAM 4 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1041 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -4 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{ABE1143C-2029-4AE5-8894-2915F7A0F789}] SEQPACKET 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1042 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{ABE1143C-2029-4AE5-8894-2915F7A0F789}] DATAGRAM 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1043 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{481012E9-6F98-411D-A3E4-3839A42E481E}] SEQPACKET 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1044 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{481012E9-6F98-411D-A3E4-3839A42E481E}] DATAGRAM 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1045 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{8E91B3C2-4AE1-48D1-A459-9F686EE93F81}] SEQPACKET 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1046 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{8E91B3C2-4AE1-48D1-A459-9F686EE93F81}] DATAGRAM 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1047 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{C56BAAC4-54FA-48E8-8EDC-C99FB4DF3CAD}] SEQPACKET 5 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1048 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -5 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{C56BAAC4-54FA-48E8-8EDC-C99FB4DF3CAD}] DATAGRAM 5 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1049 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -5 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{3DF3312A-3647-4CB2-A63F-9E5DC57C49F5}] SEQPACKET 6 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1050 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{3DF3312A-3647-4CB2-A63F-9E5DC57C49F5}] DATAGRAM 6 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1051 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Tcpip Provider ID: {22059D40-7E9E-11CF-AE5A-00AA00A7112B} Name Space: 12 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: NTDS Provider ID: {3B2637EE-E580-11CF-A555-00C04FD8D4AC} Name Space: 32 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Network Location Awareness (NLA) Namespace Provider ID: {6642243A-3BA8-4AA6-BAA5-2E0BD71FDD83} Name Space: 15 Active: 1 Version: 0 ####### End Both my computer, and yours, have the same number of components. We both have the same complement of Description and Entry Type. We have one major difference: My computer shows \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_ (NetBT transport) for MSAFD NetBIOS; yours shows \Device\Nbf_NdisWanNbfOut (NetBEUI I believe) for that description. All Catalog Entry IDs for the MSAFD NetBIOS are different too. If we're going to compare our enumerations successfully, I think you'll have to restore TCP/IP as the networking component, and remove NetBEUI. Then run thru the LSP / Winsock repair process again. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html Then let's look at "browstat status" and Winsock enumerations as a pair. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hi Chuck,
>If we're going to compare our enumerations successfully, I think you'll have to I don't know why, but the whole thing is working!>restore TCP/IP as the networking component, and remove NetBEUI. Then run thru >the LSP / Winsock repair process again. I did as you suggested above...no change. I then ran the network setup wizard to 'clear the decks' as it were and the whole network stopped dead. I could use shortcuts though, but could not access the network via the workgroup name. Event log showed 7023 error, BUT a look in services showed the computer browser service running. I had also made the error of disabling the firewall service (see MSKB 889320). I re-enabled the service and restarted the browser service and all was well. I have written the above in case somebody else finds it helpful. Chuck, I have enclosed the logs as you requested and I would be grateful if you could give them a look over to see if anything significant had changed. I swear <right hand goes up> that I have never installed any component of the nVidia firewall software. ################browser status###### Status for domain MSHOME on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} Browsing is active on domain. Master browser name is: TARDIS_2 Master browser is running build 2600 1 backup servers retrieved from master TARDIS_2 \\TARDIS_2 There are 3 servers in domain MSHOME on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} There are 1 domains in domain MSHOME on transport \Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} ########################################## #####################Winsock enumeration############ Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [TCP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1001 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [UDP/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1002 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD Tcpip [RAW/IP] Provider ID: {E70F1AA0-AB8B-11CF-8CA3-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1003 Version: 2 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 3 Protocol: 0 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP UDP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1004 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 17 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: RSVP TCP Service Provider Provider ID: {9D60A9E0-337A-11D0-BD88-0000C082E69A} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\rsvpsp.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1005 Version: 6 Address Family: 2 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 16 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 6 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD nwlnkipx [IPX] Provider ID: {11058240-BE47-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1012 Version: 2 Address Family: 6 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 14 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: 1000 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD nwlnkspx [SPX] Provider ID: {11058241-BE47-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1013 Version: 2 Address Family: 6 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 14 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: 1256 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD nwlnkspx [SPX] [Pseudo Stream] Provider ID: {11058241-BE47-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1014 Version: 2 Address Family: 6 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 14 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 1256 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD nwlnkspx [SPX II] Provider ID: {11058241-BE47-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1015 Version: 2 Address Family: 6 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 14 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: 1257 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD nwlnkspx [SPX II] [Pseudo Stream] Provider ID: {11058241-BE47-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1016 Version: 2 Address Family: 6 Max Address Length: 16 Min Address Length: 14 Socket Type: 1 Protocol: 1257 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] SEQPACKET 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1025 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364}] DATAGRAM 0 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1026 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2147483648 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] SEQPACKET 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1027 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{FEDDA13E-F505-439E-91CB-6BF87A73BAD2}] DATAGRAM 3 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1028 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -3 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{83B38E2B-D649-4AF9-89B9-319D34AA386A}] SEQPACKET 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1029 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{83B38E2B-D649-4AF9-89B9-319D34AA386A}] DATAGRAM 1 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1030 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -1 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{881D645F-12DC-4C23-B008-7D423AF37EF0}] SEQPACKET 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1031 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 5 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Winsock Catalog Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Entry Type: Base Service Provider Description: MSAFD NetBIOS [\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{881D645F-12DC-4C23-B008-7D423AF37EF0}] DATAGRAM 2 Provider ID: {8D5F1830-C273-11CF-95C8-00805F48A192} Provider Path: %SystemRoot%\system32\mswsock.dll Catalog Entry ID: 1032 Version: 2 Address Family: 17 Max Address Length: 20 Min Address Length: 20 Socket Type: 2 Protocol: -2 Protocol Chain Length: 1 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Tcpip Provider ID: {22059D40-7E9E-11CF-AE5A-00AA00A7112B} Name Space: 12 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: NTDS Provider ID: {3B2637EE-E580-11CF-A555-00C04FD8D4AC} Name Space: 32 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: Network Location Awareness (NLA) Namespace Provider ID: {6642243A-3BA8-4AA6-BAA5-2E0BD71FDD83} Name Space: 15 Active: 1 Version: 0 Name Space Provider Entry ------------------------------------------------------ Description: NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Compatible Transport Protocol Provider ID: {E02DAAF0-7E9F-11CF-AE5A-00AA00A7112B} Name Space: 1 Active: 1 Version: 1 ############################################# Even though things are fixed <touches wood> I'd love to know why! Check your mail <g>. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:23:02 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >Hi Chuck, Guy,> >>If we're going to compare our enumerations successfully, I think you'll have to >>restore TCP/IP as the networking component, and remove NetBEUI. Then run thru >>the LSP / Winsock repair process again. > >I don't know why, but the whole thing is working! > >I did as you suggested above...no change. > >I then ran the network setup wizard to 'clear the decks' as it were >and the whole network stopped dead. I could use shortcuts though, but >could not access the network via the workgroup name. Event log showed >7023 error, BUT a look in services showed the computer browser service >running. I had also made the error of disabling the firewall service >(see MSKB 889320). > >I re-enabled the service and restarted the browser service and all was >well. I have written the above in case somebody else finds it helpful. > >Chuck, I have enclosed the logs as you requested and I would be >grateful if you could give them a look over to see if anything >significant had changed. I swear <right hand goes up> that I have >never installed any component of the nVidia firewall software. > >################browser status###### > > > >Status for domain MSHOME on transport >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} > Browsing is active on domain. > Master browser name is: TARDIS_2 > Master browser is running build 2600 > 1 backup servers retrieved from master TARDIS_2 > \\TARDIS_2 > There are 3 servers in domain MSHOME on transport >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} > There are 1 domains in domain MSHOME on transport >\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{9470EF23-A69A-4E94-A608-F7B0F055C364} > >########################################## > > > >#####################Winsock enumeration############ >Even though things are fixed <touches wood> I'd love to know why! > >Check your mail <g>. I think we need to discuss what a firewall is. The legendary firewall would be one that blocks specific network traffic. By default, it is open, and passes all traffic. Modern firewalls, used by more cautious network experts, permit only specified network traffic. By default, they are closed, and pass no traffic. My suspicion is that the nForce hardware firewall falls in the latter category. If you don't run the firewall manager, it will pass only a minimum of traffic, probably just enough for you to surf to the nVidia website and get software upgrades. Right now, you're running IPX/SPX, as well as NetBT. That's OK, as long as you don't depend upon any firewalls, or other products that filter IP, to protect you. IPX/SPX bypasses firewalls. IP, IPX/SPX, and NetBEUI are different protocols. Read my comparison. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/07/windows-networking-and-alternate.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/07/windows-networking-and-alternate.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >My suspicion is that the nForce hardware firewall falls in the latter category. I would have sworn 110% it was not installed. I always turned down the>If you don't run the firewall manager, it will pass only a minimum of traffic, >probably just enough for you to surf to the nVidia website and get software >upgrades. offer to install them/it when asked, honest <g>. >Right now, you're running IPX/SPX, as well as NetBT. I used WinSock XP Fix 1.2.exe from a link on your site IIRC. I did notinstall anything else. Could the various LSP/WinSock rebuilding tools not produce the same end result? I had not used WinSock XP fix before on this PC, but used other programs/methods several times. If the nVidia firewall was indeed the culprit, the rebuilds did not fix the issue as it existed after all the rebuilds. The bindings to file sharing and client for networks shows only TCP/IP. I cannot find IPX/SPX anywhere in order to uninstall it. I'm going to do some TCP/IP building tool testing and see what different results I get. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:12:45 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>My suspicion is that the nForce hardware firewall falls in the latter category. >>If you don't run the firewall manager, it will pass only a minimum of traffic, >>probably just enough for you to surf to the nVidia website and get software >>upgrades. > >I would have sworn 110% it was not installed. I always turned down the >offer to install them/it when asked, honest <g>. > >>Right now, you're running IPX/SPX, as well as NetBT. > >I used WinSock XP Fix 1.2.exe from a link on your site IIRC. I did not >install anything else. Could the various LSP/WinSock rebuilding tools >not produce the same end result? > >I had not used WinSock XP fix before on this PC, but used other >programs/methods several times. If the nVidia firewall was indeed the >culprit, the rebuilds did not fix the issue as it existed after all >the rebuilds. > >The bindings to file sharing and client for networks shows only >TCP/IP. I cannot find IPX/SPX anywhere in order to uninstall it. > >I'm going to do some TCP/IP building tool testing and see what >different results I get. As I note in my article, various folks have written here in the past and pointed out that, where tool A didn't do anything, tool B fixed the problem. But A and B seems to change, with every report. So look at the procedure that I outline. It's based upon experience here and in various $payjob experiences. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html Now it's possible that the various procedures vary in effectiveness based upon the uniqueness of each computer needing help. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/10/computer-uniqueness.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/10/computer-uniqueness.html I have had other folks here report as you do "I don't see network component X in one place, though it shows up somewhere else". In some cases, you have to install then uninstall. Then you end up running the entire LSP / Winsock sequence. So you have all of the diagnostics that I can recommend. Make changes, and test after each change. And please let us know what you find out. Especially if you read about it elsewhere. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >So you have all of the diagnostics that I can recommend. Make changes, and test Confirmed that all TCP/IP rebuilders all include IPX/SPX. Initially,>after each change. And please let us know what you find out. only one of my three PCs had it. As you have informed me that it is a security risk vis-a-vis firewalls, I have removed it on all PCs (slaps head as should have remembered install in order to uninstall trick). As all is working well, and I have got quite a bit of training, I shall re-enable and reinstall the nVidia ethernet adaptor and see if that buggers things up or not. I shall report back here either way. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:47:19 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck All right, Guy! Have at it!><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>So you have all of the diagnostics that I can recommend. Make changes, and test >>after each change. And please let us know what you find out. > >Confirmed that all TCP/IP rebuilders all include IPX/SPX. Initially, >only one of my three PCs had it. > >As you have informed me that it is a security risk vis-a-vis >firewalls, I have removed it on all PCs (slaps head as should have >remembered install in order to uninstall trick). > >As all is working well, and I have got quite a bit of training, I >shall re-enable and reinstall the nVidia ethernet adaptor and see if >that buggers things up or not. I shall report back here either way. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >All right, Guy! Have at it! Sorry for the delay. nVidia ethernet being used with my LAN working100%. Refused offer to install firewall components (as always). -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:24:50 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>All right, Guy! Have at it! > >Sorry for the delay. nVidia ethernet being used with my LAN working >100%. Refused offer to install firewall components (as always). Think outside the box. If the nVidia firewall is, by default, closed, then the "firewall components" that you're refusing are the ones that you need to control the beast. Look at Jack Clark's thread a couple weeks ago. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >Think outside the box. I've been so outside the box for so long <g>.>If the nVidia firewall is, by default, closed, then the I thought, and correct me if I am wrong, was that you thought that I>"firewall components" that you're refusing are the ones that you need to control >the beast. Look at Jack Clark's thread a couple weeks ago. had a surreptitious firewall on my system. All I have installed are the Ethernet drivers (AFAIAA) as I have so done all along. IIRC Jack had not refused the firewall extras. No nVidia firewall components ever showed up in any WinSock/LSP scan I have ever done. No wonder you need brains to work with networks...I'm just a dentist! -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:37:16 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>Think outside the box. > >I've been so outside the box for so long <g>. > >>If the nVidia firewall is, by default, closed, then the >>"firewall components" that you're refusing are the ones that you need to control >>the beast. Look at Jack Clark's thread a couple weeks ago. > >I thought, and correct me if I am wrong, was that you thought that I >had a surreptitious firewall on my system. All I have installed are >the Ethernet drivers (AFAIAA) as I have so done all along. IIRC Jack >had not refused the firewall extras. No nVidia firewall components >ever showed up in any WinSock/LSP scan I have ever done. > >No wonder you need brains to work with networks...I'm just a dentist! I think what you are calling "firewall extras" are what you need for your firewall to work properly. My guess is that an nVidia firewall, unless configured, will not pass SMBs (NetBT or directly hosted). To configure the firewall, you have to install the extras. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/08/firewall-behaviour-and-windows.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/08/firewall-behaviour-and-windows.html Jack is a doctor, so you and he know more about the human body than I do. I think his experience can teach all of us, though, a bit about networking and the nVidia hardware based personal firewall. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >I think what you are calling "firewall extras" are what you need for your I have just reinstalled my network drivers so I could tell you exactly>firewall to work properly. My guess is that an nVidia firewall, unless >configured, will not pass SMBs (NetBT or directly hosted). what these 'extras' are. The full text is "Do you want to install NVidia firewall and Forceware Network Access Manager?" By answering 'no' I assume that the firewall is not installed. If that is not the case, then the firewall is installed and not properly configured and my LAN should not be working 110% Need a beer now... Med school was easy <g>. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:01:47 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck Guy,><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>I think what you are calling "firewall extras" are what you need for your >>firewall to work properly. My guess is that an nVidia firewall, unless >>configured, will not pass SMBs (NetBT or directly hosted). > >I have just reinstalled my network drivers so I could tell you exactly >what these 'extras' are. > >The full text is "Do you want to install NVidia firewall and Forceware >Network Access Manager?" By answering 'no' I assume that the firewall >is not installed. > >If that is not the case, then the firewall is installed and not >properly configured and my LAN should not be working 110% > >Need a beer now... Med school was easy <g>. The term "Network Access Manager" should say "not just a firewall". By answering "no", I too would ASSUME that the firewall is not installed. BUT, as I have said REPEATEDLY, it appears that the "firewall" is normally closed, not normally open. If you don't install the NAM, and configure the firewall to PASS SMBs, judging from Jack's threads, you won't have Windows Networking. Or does "the firewall is installed and not properly configured and my LAN should not be working 110%" mean that it's working now? Don't play games please, I love jokes, as much as you, but not now. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >Don't play games please, I I'm not, Chuck.>love jokes, as much as you, but not now. From what you have said there are *only two* options. 1) "as I have said REPEATEDLY, it appears that the "firewall" is normally closed, not normally open. If you don't install the NAM, and configure the firewall to PASS SMBs, judging from Jack's threads, you won't have Windows Networking." You have also said repeatedly that the firewall is installed silently. I contend that the above is not the case as according to you, I have the firewall is installed closed (default) and I have just not installed the software to configure it. Therefore, again according to you, my LAN should not be working, but IT IS, perfectly, quickly, and 110%. Surely the firewall would stop all comms, not just bork a connection to one PC leaving the other working perfectly as was my case? Also, as was the case here, the LAN was working and suddenly stopped without any drivers being installed. 2) No firewall is installed. If you go back to Jack, you will see that he DID install these extras, which, according to Jack, ARE the firewall software itself and a config program, which he was able to uninstall it separately. >Don't play games please, I love jokes, as much as you, but not now. Come on Chuck...<g>.-- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:00:50 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck So was this the first time that you re installed the drivers? As you said><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>Don't play games please, I >>love jokes, as much as you, but not now. > >I'm not, Chuck. > >From what you have said there are *only two* options. > >1) "as I have said REPEATEDLY, it appears that the "firewall" is >normally closed, not normally open. If you don't install the NAM, and >configure the firewall to PASS SMBs, judging from Jack's threads, you >won't have Windows Networking." > >You have also said repeatedly that the firewall is installed silently. > >I contend that the above is not the case as according to you, I have >the firewall is installed closed (default) and I have just not >installed the software to configure it. Therefore, again according to >you, my LAN should not be working, but IT IS, perfectly, quickly, and >110%. > >Surely the firewall would stop all comms, not just bork a connection >to one PC leaving the other working perfectly as was my case? > >Also, as was the case here, the LAN was working and suddenly stopped >without any drivers being installed. > >2) No firewall is installed. > >If you go back to Jack, you will see that he DID install these extras, >which, according to Jack, ARE the firewall software itself and a >config program, which he was able to uninstall it separately. > >>Don't play games please, I love jokes, as much as you, but not now. > >Come on Chuck...<g>. earlier: "Refused offer to install firewall components (as always)." Any idea what you did this time that worked? If the nVidia drivers are able to configure themselves properly in some cases, but not others, it would help a lot of people to know this. I'm hoping that you didn't re install IPX/SPX or NetBEUI, for instance. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >So was this the first time that you re installed the drivers? As you said I have never installed these extra bits, and my LAN has worked fine in>earlier: >"Refused offer to install firewall components (as always)." the past. I just reinstalled the drivers to get you the verbatim message that popped up. Jack inferred that he could uninstall the firewall separately from the nVidia ethernet drivers. The only time I have installed drivers is to update them. >Any idea what you did this time that worked? No, I'm puzzled. However, in a previous posting you asked me to run acommand which would show the components of the WinSock stack and LSPs. No nVidia component was present. I am not convinced that any firewall is installed if one refuses to install the 'extras', which to my reading, is the firewall itself. I am more than happy to run the executable (without installing anything, natch) and give you a listing of its contents and try to supply you with the contents of any text file (e.g.*.inf) to help you see what would be installed. >If the nVidia drivers are able to AFAIAA, I only installed and only have the ethernet drivers installed,>configure themselves properly in some cases, but not others, it would help a lot >of people to know this. and not any firewall nor firewall component. How can we check this once and for all and stay friends <vbg>? >I'm hoping that you didn't re install IPX/SPX or NetBEUI, for instance. No way. That would be a cheat. I did not reinstall IPX/SPX or NetBEUI.All is working as it did and as it should and I don't know why. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:15:43 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck The original title of this thread is "I'd sell my soul...". You did have><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>So was this the first time that you re installed the drivers? As you said >>earlier: >>"Refused offer to install firewall components (as always)." > >I have never installed these extra bits, and my LAN has worked fine in >the past. problems at one time? >>Any idea what you did this time that worked? The firewall, Guy, is part of the hardware. You have an nVidia nForce Ethernet> >No, I'm puzzled. However, in a previous posting you asked me to run a >command which would show the components of the WinSock stack and LSPs. >No nVidia component was present. I am not convinced that any firewall >is installed if one refuses to install the 'extras', which to my >reading, is the firewall itself. I am more than happy to run the >executable (without installing anything, natch) and give you a listing >of its contents and try to supply you with the contents of any text >file (e.g.*.inf) to help you see what would be installed. controller with an embedded hardware firewall. I haven't figured out why some systems show Winsock entries for nVidia components. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/hidden-personal-firewall-nvidia-nforce.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/02/hidden-personal-firewall-nvidia-nforce.html <http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_13034.html> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_13034.html >>If the nVidia drivers are able to I only argue with my friends. You have Ethernet drivers from what product?>>configure themselves properly in some cases, but not others, it would help a lot >>of people to know this. > >AFAIAA, I only installed and only have the ethernet drivers installed, >and not any firewall nor firewall component. How can we check this >once and for all and stay friends <vbg>? >>I'm hoping that you didn't re install IPX/SPX or NetBEUI, for instance. Well, I had to ask. I'd bet that cleaning up the network stack removed a> >No way. That would be a cheat. I did not reinstall IPX/SPX or NetBEUI. >All is working as it did and as it should and I don't know why. problem. Maybe some nVidia drivers, when installed on an otherwise correctly setup system, will allow SMBs. I don't know. You and Jack aren't the first folks to have problems, when an nVidia component is involved - read the nVidia forum discussions. The more folks who do analyse your problems, as you and Jack have done, the better chance we have of nailing down the problem itself. And that's why I'm asking. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck
<n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: >The firewall, Guy, is part of the hardware. You have an nVidia nForce Ethernet I thought that it only worked if drivers were installed.>controller with an embedded hardware firewall. > You have Ethernet drivers from what product? nVidia nForce Networking Controller.>You and Jack aren't the first folks to have problems, when an nVidia component Of course you should ask.>is involved - read the nVidia forum discussions. The more folks who do analyse >your problems, as you and Jack have done, the better chance we have of nailing >down the problem itself. And that's why I'm asking. -- Cheers, Guy ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights ** out of someone who richly deserves it. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:06:40 +0100, Dr Teeth <no.email.here.ple***@tardis.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when Chuck You installed nVidia drivers. The drivers let your nVidia nForce Ethernet><n***@example.net> opened his gob and said: > >>The firewall, Guy, is part of the hardware. You have an nVidia nForce Ethernet >>controller with an embedded hardware firewall. > >I thought that it only worked if drivers were installed. > >> You have Ethernet drivers from what product? > >nVidia nForce Networking Controller. > >>You and Jack aren't the first folks to have problems, when an nVidia component >>is involved - read the nVidia forum discussions. The more folks who do analyse >>your problems, as you and Jack have done, the better chance we have of nailing >>down the problem itself. And that's why I'm asking. > >Of course you should ask. controller / hardware firewall work. What specific functions are activated when you install "Ethernet drivers", and / or "firewall drivers", are at the discretion of nVidia. Both the Ethernet and firewall controllers are on the same board - the nVidia nForce. What we know (based upon what nVidia tells us) is that the nForce contains an ISCA certified hardware firewall. Anything else that we know is based upon what nVidia customers like Jack and you have observed. <http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_13034.html> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_13034.html I just spent a few minutes briefly searching the nVidia web site, to see if there's a release log for the nVidia drivers, and no luck. So I have no idea what, if anything has been changed. Let's just be thankful that you are now happy. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org.
why so slow?
What does WOL do? Node type Peer to Peer and System Error 53 DOS program "Error 2009 : Not enough space for environment" Shared printers between XP Pro and XP Home Wireless Internet - no access Setup a URL in XP How to access shared remote folder \\a.b.c.d\somefolder ? Only "net use" mapping possible adding a computer to a network Xp Pro networking with Xp Home |
|||||||||||||||||||||||