|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a telephone connectionCan one use the unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a
telephone connection? "Red" <jcopl***@prodigy.net> wrote in message And just which unused wires would they be?news:OEnRfQ9bFHA.2736@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Can one use the unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a > telephone connection? > Are you under the impression that they put extra wires in CAT5 just to have something to do? In article <eOr7tc9bFHA.***@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, "NoNoBadDog!"
<no_@spam_verizon.net> wrote: >"Red" <jcopl***@prodigy.net> wrote in message Ethernet uses four wires (pins 1, 2, 3, and 6) to carry signals. I>news:OEnRfQ9bFHA.2736@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> Can one use the unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a >> telephone connection? >> >And just which unused wires would they be? > >Are you under the impression that they put extra wires in CAT5 just to have >something to do? haven't tried it, but I think that using the other four wires for telephone connection(s) will probably work OK. It might give less than optimal Ethernet performance because of crosstalk from the phone wires to the signal-carrying wires. Try it and see. Be sure not to untwist more than 1/2 inch of the signal-carrying wires. -- Best Wishes, Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:55:09 -0700, "Red" <*email_address_deleted*> wrote: Red,>Can one use the unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a >telephone connection? Theoretically, yes, it's possible. I've seen discussions in comp.dcom.cabling about the 2 non-used pairs being used for voice communications. Realising that the 4 pairs of wires aren't connected to the RJ-45 plugs in a straight sequence - ie pair 1 - pair 2 - pair 3 - pair 4, you can't just split the cable as run, you have to terminate the cable with a standard RJ-45 connector, then split the connections inside the jack that the RJ-45 connector plugs into. But yes, some folks claim to have used a single Cat-5e (100mb) cable for both data and voice when they wired their house. Of course, a Gigabyte network won't work that way, so splitting the cable will only work til you go to Gb speeds. -- Cheers, Chuck http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem - it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck sonic net. "Red" <jcopl***@prodigy.net> wrote in message Yes, that was the intention.news:OEnRfQ9bFHA.2736@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Can one use the unused wires in a network CAT 5 (and 5e, 6) cable for a > telephone connection? > Have you ever noticed that an RJ11 plug actually fits into an RJ45 connector? Well, it does. And telephony uses the centre 2 pins on the RJ11. Plug the RJ11 into the RJ45, and the telephony is now on the centre 2 pins of the RJ45 ( 4+5 ) Ever wondered why ethernet uses pins 1+2 one way, and 3+6 the other? Seems odd pair splitting. Well, there's the answer. Because pins 4+5 were reserved as a pair for telephony. I've never actually seen this in use ( telephony on 4+5, ethernet on 1+2, 3+6 ) but that was the original intention, so a single wiring system could serve the phones and data. It may not perform too well with 100Mbit ethernet, due to crosstalk. I don't know, I've never tried. I also think gigabit ethernet perhaps requires all 4 pairs for data. -- Best Regards Ron Lowe MVP - Windows Networking |
|||||||||||||||||||||||