|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
No more connections available Win XPMy file server is running Win XP Pro. This setup has worked fine for two years. For some reason starting about 3 weeks ago (when I added my 8th PC) I am having problems with running out of connections to my file server. When I check the active sessions on the server it never shows more than 2-3 sessions. However when I check the shares, I see that IPC$ has 9-10 shares. I am assuming this is my problem. Every document I have read so far on Microsoft's web site indicates thath the limit is per computer, not connection so why am I having this problem? Two of the PC's are running a database application and each have typically 4-5 databases open. Coincidentally when I added the final PC to the network I also installed a new release of the database application. I am trying to narrow down the cause of my problem. Can someone confirm that the IPC$ share is probably my problem? If so, how do I track down which application is the culprit? Thanks! Al Al wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > I have a small business with a peer to peer network consisting of 8 (snip)> PC's. > > My file server is running Win XP Pro. This setup has worked fine for > two years. > > For some reason starting about 3 weeks ago (when I added my 8th PC) I > am > having problems with running out of connections to my file server. > When I check the active sessions on the server it never shows more > than 2-3 > sessions. However when I check the shares, I see that IPC$ has 9-10 > shares. > I am assuming this is my problem. > > Every document I have read so far on Microsoft's web site indicates > thath the limit is per computer, not connection so why am I having > this problem? You have misread the documents. The inbound concurrent connections limitation is *not* for computers; it is for *connections* and each computer can (and usually does) make more than one connection to your pseudo-server. There is no "application" to narrow down. You need to upgrade your XP Pro pseudo-server to a real server operating system. Since you are running Windows programs on the pseudo-server, you will need to use a Windows server operating system. With such a small business, Small Business Server 2003 should suit you just fine and it is less money than Standard Server. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=314882 - Inbound connections limit in XP concurrent connections: 5 for XP Home 10 for XP Pro/Tablet/MCE 49 for SBS 2000 74 for SBS 2003 Unlimited for full Server O/Ses Malke Ok, I accept that because it is the conclusion I was gradually coming to
myself. Can you answer another question for me? What's the difference between Windows Server 2003 and Windows Small Business Server? Thanks! Al
http://www.microsoft.com/servers/default.mspx
All Windows Server operating systems (including specs and features) are available from this page. -- Show quoteHide quoteRichard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rghar***@gmail.com * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. * My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "Al" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:kKHOg.107$GO2.75@trnddc01... > Ok, I accept that because it is the conclusion I was gradually coming to > myself. > > Can you answer another question for me? > > What's the difference between Windows Server 2003 and Windows Small > Business > Server? > > Thanks! > > Al Thanks for the link, but it doesn't tell me much. It just lists the
features and does not do and actual comparison between Windows Serevr 2003 and small business server 2003. Is Small Business server a subset of Server 2003? Microsofts web site mentions email support in SBS. Does that mean Exchange server is included? Do I have to buy separate CAL's for Exchange and Server? Al Al wrote:
> Thanks for the link, but it doesn't tell me much. It just lists the You can make the comparison yourself. Here is the feature set for SBS:> features and does not do and actual comparison between Windows Serevr > 2003 and small business server 2003. > > Is Small Business server a subset of Server 2003? Microsofts web site > mentions email support in SBS. Does that mean Exchange server is > included? Do I have to buy separate CAL's for Exchange and Server? > > Al http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/r2/default.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/evaluation/features/default.mspx Here are some of the features of the standard servers: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/family.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/features/comparefeatures.mspx And here is the home page for all the servers: http://www.microsoft.com/servers/default.mspx Spending a little time on these sites will make it clear that for a small business like yours, SBS would be the better fit. Malke
Get Online with cable
Cannot view network computers Networking issues after restart I can browse for just a few minutes define which of 2 internet connections to use (Win XP) problem of using remote desktop to connect wireless network Site to site routing, over a PPP connection system hang for 1 to 2 minutes and then the file opens Access denied to local network Interesting networking problem |
|||||||||||||||||||||||