|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DHCP Changes DNS OnlyUnder what conditions would a Windows XP station dynamically request a
DNS server entries only? I ask because I have workstations that use DHCP. Sometimes, these only update the DNS entries. The previously configured IP address, subnet, and gateway does not change. Thanks in advance, J Wolfgang Goerlich On 14 Sep 2006 08:04:37 -0700, jwgoerl***@gmail.com wrote:
>Under what conditions would a Windows XP station dynamically request a One possibility would be if "Use the following IP address" were selected in the>DNS server entries only? > >I ask because I have workstations that use DHCP. Sometimes, these only >update the DNS entries. The previously configured IP address, subnet, >and gateway does not change. > >Thanks in advance, > >J Wolfgang Goerlich IP settings wizard. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/08/manual-network-setup-procedures.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/08/manual-network-setup-procedures.html Otherwise, I'd suspect LSP / Winsock corruption. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/problems-with-lsp-winsock-layer-in.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Hello Chuck,
Hmmm. The workstations are setup for DHCP and thus the "Use the following IP address" option is unchecked. Winsock seems alright though I can reset it. See, there are two DHCP servers, one on each subnet. Some workstations get an IP address on subnet A and a DNS entry on subnet B. It seems that either: a) the workstations received their IP address from one DHCP server and their DNS entry from another; or b) the workstations requested a new DNS entry after a while. J Wolfgang Goerlich On 14 Sep 2006 12:01:43 -0700, jwgoerl***@gmail.com wrote:
>Hello Chuck, Well, "ipconfig /all" will show, at any time, what DHCP server provided> >Hmmm. The workstations are setup for DHCP and thus the "Use the >following IP address" option is unchecked. Winsock seems alright though >I can reset it. See, there are two DHCP servers, one on each subnet. >Some workstations get an IP address on subnet A and a DNS entry on >subnet B. > >It seems that either: a) the workstations received their IP address >from one DHCP server and their DNS entry from another; or b) the >workstations requested a new DNS entry after a while. > >J Wolfgang Goerlich settings. One server at a time - and all dynamic settings from the same server, at that time. Do you have 2 subnets on the same physical segment? With a DHCP server for each? If so, there's the problem. Why do you need two logical segments, randomly assigned? -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Yes, ipconfig /all shows the DHCP settings. The IP Address, Subnet
Mask, Default Gateway, and DHCP Server all come from one of the DHCP servers. Yet, strangely, the DNS Servers entries come from the other DHCP server. I would not have thought this possible. The only thing that I can figure is that the Windows XP computer made two separate DHCP queries. This is why I am asking for the conditions that would cause an XP box to request only the DNS server entries. J Wolfgang Goerlich On 14 Sep 2006 12:42:30 -0700, jwgoerl***@gmail.com wrote:
>Yes, ipconfig /all shows the DHCP settings. The IP Address, Subnet If you have examined "ipconfig /all", and it truly shows a computer having>Mask, Default Gateway, and DHCP Server all come from one of the DHCP >servers. Yet, strangely, the DNS Servers entries come from the other >DHCP server. > >I would not have thought this possible. The only thing that I can >figure is that the Windows XP computer made two separate DHCP queries. >This is why I am asking for the conditions that would cause an XP box >to request only the DNS server entries. > >J Wolfgang Goerlich gotten settings from 2 different DHCP servers, then I would check again for LSP / Winsock corruption, but more thoroughly. Note that there are several different LSP / Winsock repair procedures, and none of them are more effective than the others. Or I'd re examine the evidence. Does this split server assignment happen repeatedly? On multiple computers? How often? The same computer repeatedly? Maybe post "ipconfig /all" logs here for third party intrepretation. A set of 3 logs. One from a problem computer, a second from a computer properly serviced by server A, a third from a computer properly serviced by server B. Maybe examine the DHCP logs from servers A and B. And once again, why not tell us why you need 2 subnets on the same physical segment, that you allow to exist simultaneously, yet have random membership. Maybe that's part of the problem. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. > Does this split server assignment happen repeatedly? It happened once.> On multiple computers? Yes, three computers out of five lab workstations.> How often? The same computer repeatedly? Once. I haven't tried repeatedly.> Maybe post "ipconfig /all" logs here for third party intrepretation. I'll drop them in at the end of this message.> And once again, why not tell us why you need 2 subnets on the same physical I do not need two subnets on one segment, nor two DHCP servers. It was> segment, that you allow to exist simultaneously, yet have random membership. a mistake in the lab. What struck me as incredibly curious was that the workstations split the addressing. That is, I would have expected some workstations to get an IP from first DHCP server and maybe others to get an IP from the second. Instead, three of the computers obtained the IP from the first DHCP and the DNS from another. Thought maybe this would be a simple question to those more familiar with XP (I normally work on 2003). I'll have to set this back up and try to duplicate the symptom. J Wolfgang Goerlich Ipconfig /all, from my notes. The first DHCP server is 192.168.10.9. It also provides DNS and WINS. The second rouge DHCP server is 192.168.1.1 and it provides DNS. Note that the lease is from the first and the DNS is from the second. Ethernet adapter Broadcom Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : lab1.jwgoerlich.us Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.213 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:50:31 AM Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, October 13, 2006 10:50:31 AM Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : lab1.jwgoerlich.us Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.204 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:14:07 AM Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, October 13, 2006 10:14:07 AM Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : lab1.jwgoerlich.us Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Controller Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.211 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.10.9 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:09:31 AM Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, October 13, 2006 11:09:31 AM On 15 Sep 2006 11:55:49 -0700, jwgoerl***@gmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> Does this split server assignment happen repeatedly? Is your DHCP server a NAT router? I thought that you had a domain, and a real> >It happened once. > >> On multiple computers? > >Yes, three computers out of five lab workstations. > >> How often? The same computer repeatedly? > >Once. I haven't tried repeatedly. > >> Maybe post "ipconfig /all" logs here for third party intrepretation. > >I'll drop them in at the end of this message. > >> And once again, why not tell us why you need 2 subnets on the same physical >> segment, that you allow to exist simultaneously, yet have random membership. > >I do not need two subnets on one segment, nor two DHCP servers. It was >a mistake in the lab. What struck me as incredibly curious was that the >workstations split the addressing. That is, I would have expected some >workstations to get an IP from first DHCP server and maybe others to >get an IP from the second. Instead, three of the computers obtained the >IP from the first DHCP and the DNS from another. > >Thought maybe this would be a simple question to those more familiar >with XP (I normally work on 2003). I'll have to set this back up and >try to duplicate the symptom. > >J Wolfgang Goerlich > > >Ipconfig /all, from my notes. The first DHCP server is 192.168.10.9. It >also provides DNS and WINS. The second rouge DHCP server is 192.168.1.1 >and it provides DNS. Note that the lease is from the first and the DNS >is from the second. server. So your problem is actually with 3 computers in a lab, using a NAT router. And the problem happened once. Well I use a NAT router too, but not for DHCP. Maybe you could peruse the DHCP logs on both servers? Might give you a picture of what happened. Beyond that, let it happen again, and check the logs. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org.
Get Online with cable
Cannot view network computers Networking issues after restart I can browse for just a few minutes No more connections available Win XP define which of 2 internet connections to use (Win XP) problem of using remote desktop to connect wireless network Site to site routing, over a PPP connection Xbox cannot find dns Interesting networking problem |
|||||||||||||||||||||||