|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wired 100mb network connection constantly "sends"512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly (@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network connections: Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and more. Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics 802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same results. On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:02 -0700, Tommy Jones
<TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >I have Windows XP, SP2 with all updates applied (running on a Sony Viao with Tommy,>512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly >(@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an >excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being >online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network >connections: >Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 >Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 > >Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but >why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a >billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). > >I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any >unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) >and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. > >This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and >more. > >Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! > >p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a >US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics >802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to >provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same >results. That is a pretty large number. Does Port Explorer show which process is running the numbers up? The Sent and Received columns can be pretty useful here. -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. No, Port Explorer doesn't show any excessive activity. It's as if the
counter in the display is just incrementing itself. When I have a Port Explorer windows open right next to the "Local LAN Connection" Status window, I can watch the number in the "status" window incrementing at a tremendous rate (i.e., a couple of a million in less than 60 seconds), yet Port Explorer only shows 600-700 bytes being sent. A real puzzler. Tommy ======= Show quoteHide quote "Chuck" wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:02 -0700, Tommy Jones > <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >I have Windows XP, SP2 with all updates applied (running on a Sony Viao with > >512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly > >(@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an > >excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being > >online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network > >connections: > >Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 > >Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 > > > >Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but > >why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a > >billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). > > > >I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any > >unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) > >and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. > > > >This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and > >more. > > > >Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! > > > >p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a > >US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics > >802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to > >provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same > >results. > > Tommy, > > That is a pretty large number. Does Port Explorer show which process is running > the numbers up? The Sent and Received columns can be pretty useful here. > > -- > Cheers, > Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] > http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ > Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. > My email is AT DOT > actual address pchuck mvps org. > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:53:02 -0700, Tommy Jones
<TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >"Chuck" wrote: OK, Tommy,> >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:02 -0700, Tommy Jones >> <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >I have Windows XP, SP2 with all updates applied (running on a Sony Viao with >> >512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly >> >(@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an >> >excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being >> >online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network >> >connections: >> >Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 >> >Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 >> > >> >Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but >> >why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a >> >billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). >> > >> >I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any >> >unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) >> >and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. >> > >> >This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and >> >more. >> > >> >Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! >> > >> >p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a >> >US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics >> >802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to >> >provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same >> >results. >> >> Tommy, >> >> That is a pretty large number. Does Port Explorer show which process is running >> the numbers up? The Sent and Received columns can be pretty useful here. >No, Port Explorer doesn't show any excessive activity. It's as if the >counter in the display is just incrementing itself. When I have a Port >Explorer windows open right next to the "Local LAN Connection" Status window, >I can watch the number in the "status" window incrementing at a tremendous >rate (i.e., a couple of a million in less than 60 seconds), yet Port Explorer >only shows 600-700 bytes being sent. > >A real puzzler. And have you identified all of the processes that do show in Port Explorer, with numbers increasing at any rate? And if you can't reach a conclusion, I'd highly recommend HijackThis and expert advice. And BlackLight or Rootkit Revealer. <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org. Chuck,
I looked at the info in Port Explorer and it all looks okay, but I'll look again. And thanks for recommending the other two options. Maybe one of them will provide some insight. I've seen a lot in my 30 years of doing this stuff, but this one truly has me baffled. Tommy ==== Show quoteHide quote "Chuck" wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:53:02 -0700, Tommy Jones > <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >"Chuck" wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:02 -0700, Tommy Jones > >> <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I have Windows XP, SP2 with all updates applied (running on a Sony Viao with > >> >512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly > >> >(@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an > >> >excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being > >> >online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network > >> >connections: > >> >Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 > >> >Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 > >> > > >> >Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but > >> >why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a > >> >billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). > >> > > >> >I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any > >> >unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) > >> >and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. > >> > > >> >This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and > >> >more. > >> > > >> >Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! > >> > > >> >p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a > >> >US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics > >> >802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to > >> >provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same > >> >results. > >> > >> Tommy, > >> > >> That is a pretty large number. Does Port Explorer show which process is running > >> the numbers up? The Sent and Received columns can be pretty useful here. > > >No, Port Explorer doesn't show any excessive activity. It's as if the > >counter in the display is just incrementing itself. When I have a Port > >Explorer windows open right next to the "Local LAN Connection" Status window, > >I can watch the number in the "status" window incrementing at a tremendous > >rate (i.e., a couple of a million in less than 60 seconds), yet Port Explorer > >only shows 600-700 bytes being sent. > > > >A real puzzler. > > OK, Tommy, > > And have you identified all of the processes that do show in Port Explorer, with > numbers increasing at any rate? > > And if you can't reach a conclusion, I'd highly recommend HijackThis and expert > advice. And BlackLight or Rootkit Revealer. > <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html> > http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html > <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html> > http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html > > -- > Cheers, > Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] > http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ > Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. > My email is AT DOT > actual address pchuck mvps org. > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:20:02 -0700, Tommy Jones
<TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >"Chuck" wrote: If you don't see any numbers in Port Explorer to equal what you see in My> >> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:53:02 -0700, Tommy Jones >> <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >"Chuck" wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:02 -0700, Tommy Jones >> >> <TommyJo***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >I have Windows XP, SP2 with all updates applied (running on a Sony Viao with >> >> >512mb, a 2.4 P4 and 60GB). I connect to a USR 54g router (both wirelessly >> >> >(@125mb) and wired (@100mb)), but the wired connnection numbers show an >> >> >excessive (and I mean excessive) number of "sends." For example, after being >> >> >online for 52 minutes, here are the stats when I open up my network >> >> >connections: >> >> >Wireless: Sent = 1,608,811 Received = 8,065,967 >> >> >Wireed: Sent = 17,732,689,652,039 Received = 14,535 >> >> > >> >> >Clearly my wireless connection is doing the bulk of the transmissions, but >> >> >why does my wired "sent" number esclate so high, so fast (e.g., they reach a >> >> >billion+ in the first few minutes after powering up). >> >> > >> >> >I have loaded Port Explorer and Process Explorer and neither shows any >> >> >unusual activity. I'm also update on my Norton Anti-Virus (i.e., none found) >> >> >and Spy Sweeper anti-spyware. >> >> > >> >> >This has been going on for months, and the machine is slowing down more and >> >> >more. >> >> > >> >> >Any thoughts???? This one is a real brain-buster! >> >> > >> >> >p.s. My wired NIC is the Intel PRO/100 VE Adapter and my wireless NIC is a >> >> >US Robotics 802.11G Wireless Turbo Adapter. The router is a US Robotics >> >> >802.11g Wireless Turbo Router (both adapter and router firmware upgraded to >> >> >provide 125mb) and I've even put in a different router, but get the same >> >> >results. >> >> >> >> Tommy, >> >> >> >> That is a pretty large number. Does Port Explorer show which process is running >> >> the numbers up? The Sent and Received columns can be pretty useful here. >> >> >No, Port Explorer doesn't show any excessive activity. It's as if the >> >counter in the display is just incrementing itself. When I have a Port >> >Explorer windows open right next to the "Local LAN Connection" Status window, >> >I can watch the number in the "status" window incrementing at a tremendous >> >rate (i.e., a couple of a million in less than 60 seconds), yet Port Explorer >> >only shows 600-700 bytes being sent. >> > >> >A real puzzler. >> >> OK, Tommy, >> >> And have you identified all of the processes that do show in Port Explorer, with >> numbers increasing at any rate? >> >> And if you can't reach a conclusion, I'd highly recommend HijackThis and expert >> advice. And BlackLight or Rootkit Revealer. >> <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html> >> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/interpreting-hijackthis-logs-with.html >> <http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html> >> http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2006/06/deeply-hidden-and-heavily-protected.html >Chuck, > >I looked at the info in Port Explorer and it all looks okay, but I'll look >again. And thanks for recommending the other two options. Maybe one of them >will provide some insight. I've seen a lot in my 30 years of doing this >stuff, but this one truly has me baffled. > >Tommy >==== Network Connections, then you could well have a rootkit type malware in action. And you will need expert security advice. The hell of it is, the experts will probably advise you to "nuke and pave". <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuke_and_pave> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuke_and_pave -- Cheers, Chuck, MS-MVP [Windows - Networking] http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/ Paranoia is not a problem, when it's a normal response from experience. My email is AT DOT actual address pchuck mvps org.
IP Address on LAN
File sharing problems computer not renewing dhcp lease no internet connection, but have intranet connection Can i use netbeui with netbios in XP? Hibernation and Internet connection. Slow opening file dialog boxes on home network XP Printing Problem on Small Peer to Peer Network How to connect wifi while using modem dialup? ACT! Installation Error |
|||||||||||||||||||||||