|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Add Wireless Access Point to Existing Wireless Router?desktops and one laptop via Cat5 and two laptops wirelessly all on XP-Home. I want to increase coverage of the wireless portion...can I do this by connecting a wireless access point to the existing router via Cat5? If so how does the access point get configured into the existing network? TIA Pegleg U.S. Navy Retired Support Our Troops, Question The Policy! All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope. Sir Winston Churchill Pegleg wrote:
> I currently have a Netgear WGR614 Router installed. It feeds two You don't want to add an access point; you want to add a range extender.> desktops and one laptop via Cat5 and two laptops wirelessly all on > XP-Home. > > I want to increase coverage of the wireless portion...can I do this by > connecting a wireless access point to the existing router via Cat5? > > If so how does the access point get configured into the existing > network? See: http://www.ezlan.net/Distance.html Malke On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 05:17:27 -0700, Malke <notreally@invalid.invalid>
wrote: >You don't want to add an access point; you want to add a range extender. Thanks for the post but they don't seem to have much that is compatible>See: > >http://www.ezlan.net/Distance.html with Netgear hardware. Pegleg U.S. Navy Retired Support Our Troops, Question The Policy! All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope. Sir Winston Churchill Pegleg wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 05:17:27 -0700, Malke <notreally@invalid.invalid> Google is your friend.> wrote: > > >>You don't want to add an access point; you want to add a range >>extender. See: >> >>http://www.ezlan.net/Distance.html > > Thanks for the post but they don't seem to have much that is > compatible with Netgear hardware. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=range+extender+Netgear&btnG=Google+Search Results 1 - 10 of about 296,000 for range extender Netgear. (0.16 seconds) And please fix your signature. It should have a signature delimiter to start with and be no more than 4 lines: http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/signatur.html Malke On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:07:00 -0700, Malke <notreally@invalid.invalid>
wrote: >And please fix your signature. It should have a signature delimiter to N.B.>start with and be no more than 4 lines: >http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/signatur.html This is a sensible and commendable restriction. But contrary to the common belief and frequent claims its nature is that of a recommendation. Pegleg U.S. Navy Retired Support Our Troops, Question The Policy! All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope. Sir Winston Churchill
Show quote
Hide quote
"Pegleg" <brian.pegleg.jones@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message Yes. You can add an additional WAP or alternatively use a range extender. news:o372f21fvabt5da1vuht45trqk9sup8evv@4ax.com... >I currently have a Netgear WGR614 Router installed. It feeds two > desktops and one laptop via Cat5 and two laptops wirelessly all on > XP-Home. > > I want to increase coverage of the wireless portion...can I do this by > connecting a wireless access point to the existing router via Cat5? > > If so how does the access point get configured into the existing > network? > > TIA > > (We do that all the time in office buildings.) If you add an additional WAP, it is best to assign it a fixed IP address within the subnet of your wireless router but outside it's DHCP range. It should use the same SSID but a different channel. (1,6, and 11 are the three discreet choices). If the WAP has a DHCP server option (some do and some don't), turn it off. This kind of configuration is the typical set up for wireless roaming. The choice between an additional WAP or range extender would consider issues like price and relative difficulty of running an Ethernet cable to the secondary location. On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:54:11 -0400, "GTS" <x> wrote: Which works better? The Cat 5 run will only be about 30 feet.>The choice between an additional WAP or range extender would consider issues >like price and relative difficulty of running an Ethernet cable to the >secondary location. Pegleg U.S. Navy Retired Support Our Troops, Question The Policy! All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope. Sir Winston Churchill "Pegleg" <brian.pegleg.jones@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message If wiring isn't a problem for you, I would go with the secondary WAP. I news:hpv5f255lom17opvdu1pf2mn88g2ojepfj@4ax.com... > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:54:11 -0400, "GTS" <x> wrote: > >>The choice between an additional WAP or range extender would consider >>issues >>like price and relative difficulty of running an Ethernet cable to the >>secondary location. > > Which works better? The Cat 5 run will only be about 30 feet. > > > Pegleg haven't worked a lot with range extenders, but what I have seen (and read) of them is a mixed picture. Reliability and speed may vary considerably depending on the quality of the AC power line. They're most commonly used only if running an Ethernet cable is too costly or difficult. On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:18:45 -0400, "GTS" <x> wrote: Pegleg>If wiring isn't a problem for you, I would go with the secondary WAP. I >haven't worked a lot with range extenders, but what I have seen (and read) >of them is a mixed picture. Reliability and speed may vary considerably >depending on the quality of the AC power line. They're most commonly used >only if running an Ethernet cable is too costly or difficult. > Thanks much! U.S. Navy Retired Support Our Troops, Question The Policy! All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope. Sir Winston Churchill
Show quote
Hide quote
"Pegleg" <brian.pegleg.jones@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message You're welcome.news:qp56f2psoptaufhvmdrqjbmgb1fuv4dhdp@4ax.com... > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:18:45 -0400, "GTS" <x> wrote: > > >>If wiring isn't a problem for you, I would go with the secondary WAP. I >>haven't worked a lot with range extenders, but what I have seen (and read) >>of them is a mixed picture. Reliability and speed may vary considerably >>depending on the quality of the AC power line. They're most commonly used >>only if running an Ethernet cable is too costly or difficult. >> > Thanks much! > > Pegleg
Network printing (Wireless)
Trying to figure out if I can use wireless networking! Reconnecting Network Drives after rebbot Wireless XP Linksys WRT54G - WinXP lost connections Peer to Peer Wireless Extended Peer to Peer Setup. not connected ? yes i am... Shared Network Printer Problem Not connecting to network path |
|||||||||||||||||||||||