|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
How to share wired Internet connection in hotel using two wireless PCswith my two wireless computers? The hotel charges $30/day for the wired Internet connection, which is OK. However, they charge for each laptop which I find to be highway robbery especially since they only supply wired Internet so there's no way to share between rooms. Luckily, both Windows XP computers are wireless. Is there any way to use the wireless part of the WinXP computers to SHARE the initial connection? Is this too basic a question? Here is what I have done so far: a) Shut down both computers and hook the wired ethernet to the computer whose MAC address (I suspect) was registered when I bought the Internet service from the web page. b) Boot both WinXP laptops and check the ip address (ipconfig /all) which shows the computer with the wired connection has an IP address of: IP Address. . . . . . . . . ... . . : 192.168.2.6 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.248.0 c) The other computer, not on the network, had no IP address (can that happen?) Media State = Media disconnected. The question is how to use the second computer to connect to the first computer via the built-in wireless card? Can that be done? How? Cindy Cindy,
Here's the information on how to connect two computers and share Internet connection wirelessly without additional equipment: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/bowman_02april08.mspx The info seems to be up to date. -- Show quoteHide quoteSvyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- "Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1157531558.056874.221870@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > Can you help me network a single wired Internet connection at my hotel > with my > two wireless computers? > > The hotel charges $30/day for the wired Internet connection, which is > OK. However, they charge for each laptop which I find to be highway > robbery especially since they only supply wired Internet so there's no > way to share between rooms. > > Luckily, both Windows XP computers are wireless. > > Is there any way to use the wireless part of the WinXP computers to > SHARE the initial connection? > > Is this too basic a question? > > Here is what I have done so far: > a) Shut down both computers and hook the wired ethernet to the > computer whose MAC address (I suspect) was registered when I bought the > Internet service from the web page. > b) Boot both WinXP laptops and check the ip address (ipconfig /all) > which shows the > computer with the wired connection has an IP address of: > IP Address. . . . . . . . . ... . . : 192.168.2.6 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.248.0 > c) The other computer, not on the network, had no IP address (can that > happen?) > Media State = Media disconnected. > > The question is how to use the second computer to connect to the first > computer via the built-in wireless card? Can that be done? How? > > Cindy > S. Pidgorny <MVP> wrote:
> Here's the information on how to connect two computers and share Internet Hi S. Pidgorny,> connection wirelessly without additional equipment: > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/bowman_02april08.mspx Oh my. You do have a great potential answer here! You are just what the doctor ordered. A great many people would benefit from this discussion as it applies even to home or office use to have one wired Internet connection work with two computers in the same room (one at a time). Reading your suggested web page about building an ad hoc 802.11b wireless network using the graphical user interface in Windows XP was very interesting: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/bowman_02april08.mspx According to your document, the main steps to follow are: 1. Set the 1st PC as an ad-hoc (pc-to-pc) wireless connection 2. Ensure the wireless card is working properly in the second PC 3. Enable Internet Connection Sharing on the first PC More specifically, it seems, first, on PC1, we: * Ensure PC1 is hooked to the Internet via the Ethernet wire * Start > Settings > Network Connections * Rightclick on the wireless network icon * View Available Wireless Networks > Change Advanced Settings * Select the "Wireless Networks" tab * Hit the "Advanced" button * Select "Computer to computer (ad hoc) networks only" * And clear the "Automatically connect to non-preferred networks" box Ooops. I hit the return button too soon. Here for all to benefit, are
the steps as I understand them (please fix where I make mistakes) to create and share an ad-hoc computer-to-computer wireless network without need for a wireless router or wired hub. A) To set up the HOST computer (the one with the wired connection): * Ensure the host PC1 is hooked to the Internet via the Ethernet wire * On WinXP PC1, press Start > Settings > Network Connections * Then rightclick on the wireless network icon and select * View Available Wireless Networks > Change Advanced Settings * Select the "Wireless Networks" tab * Hit the "Advanced" button * Select "Computer to computer (ad hoc) networks only" * And clear the "Automatically connect to non-preferred networks" box * Again select the "Wireless Networks" tab * Under "Preferred Networks", hit the "Add" button * Enter in a "Network Name (SSID)" of "Hotel" * Notice the grayed-out checked box indicating "This is a computer-to-computer (ad hoc) network; wireless access points are not used" * For now, leave the "Network Authentication" as "Open" * Likewise, leave the "Data encryption" as "Disabled" for now * OK your way out of these forms B) To set up the CLIENT computer (the one that will be wireless): * On WinXP PC2, press Start > Settings > Network Connections * Then rightclick on the wireless network icon and select * View Available Wireless Networks * You should see "Hotel" as an "Unsecured computer-to-computer network" * Select "Hotel", press the "Connect", & "Connect Anyway" buttons * You'll see the message "Acquiring network address" * Soon you should see the message "Connected" C) To Share the Internet connection: * Go back to the host WinXP computer, PC1 * Make a note of the wired connection's name (e.g., Local Area Connection) * Press Start > Settings > Control Panel * Switch to classic view > Network Connections. * Rightclick the connection to be shared * Under Network Tasks, click "Change advanced settings" * Select the "Advanced" tab * Select the "Allow other network users to connect through this computer's Internet connection" check box. * Disable the setting to "Allow other network users control or disable the shared Internet connection" * Optionally turn on the Windows Firewall * In the "Home networking connection", select a private network connection of "Local Area Connection" (i.e., the connection to the wired network) * OK your way out of the forms If the planets align, after you've completed this ICS configuratoin, the Network Connection window on the host PC1 should display the original wired Ethernet connection and display the status as Shared as well as Enabled. Likewise, the Network Connection window on the client PC2 should display the connection on the host as an Internet Gateway. The client PC2 should now receive a private class, non-routable IP address in the 192.168.0.* address range via DHCP from the host computer and should have full Internet connectivity. Multiple client PCs can be connected in this manner. Bear in mind, all this is theoretical. I tried it, but it didn't work (so I'm debugging as we speak). I'll let you know what I find out. Note: For some inexplicable reason, I lost my wired connection when I ran the steps above but I got it back by turning off "Enable IEEE 802.1x authentication for this network" in the "Local Area Connection" "Authentication" tab on the host PC1; and then by selecting in the "Advanced" tab in the "Internet Connections Sharing" section to "Allow other network users to connect through this computer's Internet connection". But, so many settings happened, that I'm not sure all the steps above were exact as I still don't have PC2 connected to PC1 wirelessly without a router. Cindy > Here are the steps to create and share an ad-hoc computer-to-computer I now have PC1 connected again but PC2 says its connected to the> wireless network without need for a wireless router or wired hub. "Hotel" network but it doesn't work. I need to debug. Maybe I'll just change the MAC address so that both PCs are the same MAC address. That would, of course, only work with the ethernet cable connected to one at a time (which is OK ... just not as convenient as being wireless in the hotel room). I found a freeware MAC address changer here: http://www.gorlani.com/downloads/dlchk.asp?fname=macmakeup.zip Cindy Cindy wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> Here are the steps to create and share an ad-hoc computer-to-computer If you haven't got the kinks out yet, here are a couple of >> wireless network without need for a wireless router or wired hub. > > I now have PC1 connected again but PC2 says its connected to the > "Hotel" network but it doesn't work. I need to debug. > > Maybe I'll just change the MAC address so that both PCs are the same > MAC address. > > That would, of course, only work with the ethernet cable connected to > one at a time (which is OK ... just not as convenient as being wireless > in the hotel room). > > I found a freeware MAC address changer here: > http://www.gorlani.com/downloads/dlchk.asp?fname=macmakeup.zip > > Cindy > suggestions/observations -- I have to admit, however, that I haven't set up such a connection sharing system myself. You shouldn't have to fiddle with the MAC address of PC2. If things work correctly, the hotel network will not be aware of your second PC -- which is the point, after all. For almost all home wifi networks -- this one too -- the "Enable IEEE 802.1x authentication for this network" should be UNchecked. This is for network security using a RADIUS server. Try setting up ICS in PC1 BEFORE enabling PC2. Normally, when XP computers use "ad hoc" networking, Windows assigns an "Automatic Private IP Address" (APIPA) in the range 169.254.0.1 to 169.254.255.254. On the other hand, when Internet Connection Sharing is activated, the XP system acting as the "host" simulates a DHCP server, assigns itself an IP address of 192.168.0.1 and assigns IP addresses to other PCs on the LAN (wireless or wired) in the 192.168.0.2 - 192.168.0.254 range. See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/306126/ So, if you set up PC2 as an ad hoc wireless client before setting PC1 to use ICS, PC2 will assign itself an IP that's incompatible with the subnet used by ICS. To help debug, open a command prompt window on both computers and type ipconfig /all [enter] On PC1 (wired to the $30/day network) you should see info for two adapters -- the Ethernet adapter and the wireless adapter. The IP address assigned to the wireless adapter should be 192.168.0.1 and the corresponding subnet mask should be 255.255.255.0 On PC2, only one adapter will be active -- the wireless adapter. This should have an address such as 192.168.0.x You can always set IP address manually, from the "properties" page for the connection. Highlight TCP/IP and click Properties. On on, 06 sep 2006 14:57:56 GMT, "Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless:<snip> > Maybe I'll just change the MAC address so that both PCs are the same Start -> Control Panels -> Networking -> Properties -> Configure -> > MAC address. > > That would, of course, only work with the ethernet cable connected to > one at a time (which is OK ... just not as convenient as being wireless > in the hotel room). > > I found a freeware MAC address changer here: > http://www.gorlani.com/downloads/dlchk.asp?fname=macmakeup.zip Advanced. Enter a new MAC in Network Address. I don't think that manipulating MAC address of the PC2 will give you
something - only PC1 is connected to the hotel network, and only its MAC address should be used to send information to the hotel's switch. I'm afraid I can't really help troubleshooting the issue in the offline - intercontinental mode. Make sure that PC2 receives 192.168.0.x IP address from DHCP server on PC1 (this is how ICS works); and that Windows Firewall is disabled for the wireless adapter on PC1. Sharing must work thereafter. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't - hotel cannot realistically prevent this. -- Show quoteHide quoteSvyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- "Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1157554676.133029.255490@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> Here are the steps to create and share an ad-hoc computer-to-computer >> wireless network without need for a wireless router or wired hub. > > I now have PC1 connected again but PC2 says its connected to the > "Hotel" network but it doesn't work. I need to debug. > > Maybe I'll just change the MAC address so that both PCs are the same > MAC address. > > That would, of course, only work with the ethernet cable connected to > one at a time (which is OK ... just not as convenient as being wireless > in the hotel room). > > I found a freeware MAC address changer here: > http://www.gorlani.com/downloads/dlchk.asp?fname=macmakeup.zip > > Cindy > S. Pidgorny <MVP> wrote:
> I don't think that manipulating MAC address of the PC2 will give you Hi S. Pidgorny,> something - only PC1 is connected to the hotel network, and only its MAC > address should be used to send information to the hotel's switch. Actually, the MAC address switching did work fine. Here, in Singapore, I bought a longer wire so I could use my second computer on the bed. A three meter cat6 cable cost five Singapore dollars (the taxi to go get it cost more). However, only one computer at a time can be connected because not only do they both have the same MAC address now, but, there is only one wire and I don't have a router or hub or switch. Still, it would have been nice to get the one wired computer to wirelessly serve the second wireless computer without a router ... so when I get back home in a few weeks (I'm heading for Shanghai and then Shin-Yokohama before heading home in a week) I'll try it on my home network by unplugging my wireless router. Thank you very much for your help and advice, Cindy Fischer
Show quote
Hide quote
"Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in message You might consider a small travel type wireless router. Here is an example news:1157531558.056874.221870@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > Can you help me network a single wired Internet connection at my hotel > with my > two wireless computers? > > The hotel charges $30/day for the wired Internet connection, which is > OK. However, they charge for each laptop which I find to be highway > robbery especially since they only supply wired Internet so there's no > way to share between rooms. > > Luckily, both Windows XP computers are wireless. > > Is there any way to use the wireless part of the WinXP computers to > SHARE the initial connection? > > Is this too basic a question? > > Here is what I have done so far: > a) Shut down both computers and hook the wired ethernet to the > computer whose MAC address (I suspect) was registered when I bought the > Internet service from the web page. > b) Boot both WinXP laptops and check the ip address (ipconfig /all) > which shows the > computer with the wired connection has an IP address of: > IP Address. . . . . . . . . ... . . : 192.168.2.6 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.248.0 > c) The other computer, not on the network, had no IP address (can that > happen?) > Media State = Media disconnected. > > The question is how to use the second computer to connect to the first > computer via the built-in wireless card? Can that be done? How? > > Cindy > of one made by Netgear. There may be others... http://www.netgear.com/Products/RoutersandGateways/GWirelessRouters/WGR101.aspx -- Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking) Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us... The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights... Sooner Al [MVP] wrote:
> You might consider a small travel type wireless router. Hi Al Sooner (Sooner Al?),> http://www.netgear.com/Products/RoutersandGateways/GWirelessRouters/WGR101.aspx I like your suggestion. Not only is this deck-of-card sized wireless router an interesting potential addition to my travel kit, but, it also would give me the freedom to move around the room while connected. Currently, I'm "tethered" to the desk by wire; but I vastly prefer to work on the bed with all those fluffy pillows spread around (not to mention my VOIP calls back to the states tethered to the computer via headphones and a mic to avoid the pillaging and plundering that goes on with overseas phone calls from my room). It would be great to make those VOIP calls lying down in my nice comfortable bed with the convenience bar only an arms' length away. I have one theoretical question with this method ... I called the hotel who said they key off the MAC address. If I were to use the wireless router (which I don't have, but I ask this to better understand the solution) ... would the hotel then key off the MAC address of the wireless router and not off the two wireless laptops "connected" to the wireless router? Would that solution be any better (or different theoretically) than if I purchased a small hub (switch?) and some long CAT5 ethernet cable? This is very interesting to me, so I hope you respond, so we all benefit, Cindy
Show quote
Hide quote
"Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in message Yes, in this case you would give them the MAC address of the router.news:1157549431.456679.246310@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > Sooner Al [MVP] wrote: >> You might consider a small travel type wireless router. >> http://www.netgear.com/Products/RoutersandGateways/GWirelessRouters/WGR101.aspx > > Hi Al Sooner (Sooner Al?), > > I like your suggestion. > > Not only is this deck-of-card sized wireless router an interesting > potential addition to my travel kit, but, it also would give me the > freedom to move around the room while connected. > > Currently, I'm "tethered" to the desk by wire; but I vastly prefer to > work on the bed with all those fluffy pillows spread around (not to > mention my VOIP calls back to the states tethered to the computer via > headphones and a mic to avoid the pillaging and plundering that goes on > with overseas phone calls from my room). It would be great to make > those VOIP calls lying down in my nice comfortable bed with the > convenience bar only an arms' length away. > > I have one theoretical question with this method ... > I called the hotel who said they key off the MAC address. If I were to > use the wireless router (which I don't have, but I ask this to better > understand the solution) ... would the hotel then key off the MAC > address of the wireless router and not off the two wireless laptops > "connected" to the wireless router? > > Would that solution be any better (or different theoretically) than if > I purchased a small hub (switch?) and some long CAT5 ethernet cable? > > This is very interesting to me, so I hope you respond, so we all > benefit, > Cindy > -- Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking) Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us... The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights... Sooner Al [MVP] wrote:
> Yes, in this case you would give them the MAC address of the router. Actually, we don't give the network the MAC address, the network'grabs' the MAC address on its own. So, I presume as long as the router is in between the hotel cat5 cable and the PC, that the hotel network will only "see" the MAC address of the NAT router. Cindy Fischer Cindy wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Sooner Al [MVP] wrote: It's my understanding that the MAC address is used to verify the> > You might consider a small travel type wireless router. > > http://www.netgear.com/Products/RoutersandGateways/GWirelessRouters/WGR101.aspx > > Hi Al Sooner (Sooner Al?), > > I like your suggestion. > > Not only is this deck-of-card sized wireless router an interesting > potential addition to my travel kit, but, it also would give me the > freedom to move around the room while connected. > > Currently, I'm "tethered" to the desk by wire; but I vastly prefer to > work on the bed with all those fluffy pillows spread around (not to > mention my VOIP calls back to the states tethered to the computer via > headphones and a mic to avoid the pillaging and plundering that goes on > with overseas phone calls from my room). It would be great to make > those VOIP calls lying down in my nice comfortable bed with the > convenience bar only an arms' length away. > > I have one theoretical question with this method ... > I called the hotel who said they key off the MAC address. If I were to > use the wireless router (which I don't have, but I ask this to better > understand the solution) ... would the hotel then key off the MAC > address of the wireless router and not off the two wireless laptops > "connected" to the wireless router? > > Would that solution be any better (or different theoretically) than if > I purchased a small hub (switch?) and some long CAT5 ethernet cable? > > This is very interesting to me, so I hope you respond, so we all > benefit, > Cindy equipment you registered w/ the Front Desk is actually getting the IP address they set aside for you. In other words, giving them the MAC address from the Wireless Router would be the way to go; it should 'shield' your downstream laptop(s) from view by the Hotel's Networking and 'bing, bing- Bobs your Uncle. While the Netgear device looks sexy enough you should perhaps study and verify if what it's putting out meets your hardware's needs or not. (Likely it'll be OK.) Lastly, all things being equal there remains the common experience of wired being faster than wireless and too many cooks on the wire spoiling the soup (there may be a time when the wireless device represents a device too many between you and the Internet for example. I mention it but I myself find it a _remote_ possibility.) Enjoy, hth. TBerk TBerk wrote:
> > Currently, I'm "tethered" to the desk by wire; Hi Berk,> > I have one theoretical question > > If I were to use the wireless router (which I don't have, > > would the hotel then key off the MAC address of the wireless router > Giving the hotel the MAC address from the Wireless Router > would be the way to go; it should 'shield' your downstream laptop(s) > from view by the Hotel's Networking and 'bing, bing- Bobs your Uncle. Thanks for that explanation. I would guess one would power up the wireless router plugged into the hotel wired network. Then, one would power up the wireless router. Nothing would happen. Then one would power up one of the portable PCs. Presumably when that portable PC accesses the NAT, it would send the MAC address of the wireless router to the hotel network. If this is true, then when one powers up the second PC, the NAT would still send the same MAC address of the NAT wireless router to the hotel network. Presumably, this would provide exactly what I desire (with the nice addition of a firewall) ... yet I don't have this wireless router thousands of miles away from home. What I'm trying to do is tie one PC wired to the hotel network and then wirelessly connect the second PC to the first PC to the wired hotel network. According to the google literature, it _should_ work ... but so far I've had almost connections but no real connection. If anyone has a good reference for how to tie a second PC wirelessly to a first PC wired, that would be wonderful for all of us! Cindy Fischer I would purchase one of the small travel routers with wireless and a wired
switch. you would then plug the hotels wired ethernet connect into the wan port of your router. the wan ports mac then becomes registered with the hotel and you are free to setup your own private network in your room with both wired and wireless clients.. This would enable you to share files and have both machines on the internet at the same time.. Adair Adair Witner wrote:
> I would purchase one of the small travel routers with wireless and a wired Hi Adair Witner,> switch. Yes, that would work. What is simpler is to spoof the MAC address. Both would work. The problem with the travel router approach is that I'm thousands of miles from home sans the travel router; the problem with the second approach is that the cable is too short to move about the room. Both, of course, can be rectified with a shopping trip to the local electronics emporium. But, I'm a stubborn gal in that I would really like to obtain the elegance of tying a second wireless PC to the first wired PC without benefit of a wireless router. According to Microsoft, it _should_ be possible (they even say it's easy). Do you have another source for setting this supposedly easy network up other than: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/bowman_02april08.mspx Cindy Fischer you are making it far too difficult.....
wireless router and you are done....... or just create a vpn connection to whichever computer is online...... 30 bucks a day? Shoot, I would just find a coffee shop around the corner.......I bet in the lobby if it is a remotely populated area, you could jump on someones unsecured netowork.... Chuck garciyala***@hotmail.com wrote:
> wireless router and you are done....... Hi Chuck,> or just create a vpn connection to whichever computer is online...... > you could jump on someones unsecured netowork.... Thanks for the advice; but I don't understand two of your three suggestions: SUGGESTION 1: - Wireless router - I'm fifteen countries away from my home; where would I get a wireless router? SUGGESTION 2: - Create a vpn connection. - I do not understand this at all. Yes, I have the Nortel Networks Contivity VPN client. - But, without a network, how would I use this to connect my two computers? SUGGESTION 3: - Jump on someone elses' unsecured network. - I always wondered how to do that. - If I "see" someone else's network, just connecting to it doesn't give me Internet access. - Am I doing something wrong? Chuck ... I do appreciate your help. But, can you clarify how I could use the Nortel VPN software to connect a second PC to the first PC's wired ethernet connection? Same with jumping on someone else's network. Once I "connect" ... why don't I have any Internet access when I connect to someone's unsecured connection? What am I doing wrong? Cindy Cindy,
You need a wireless bridge with NAT - you canuse either one of your PCs, or an appliance for that purpose. However, NAT (hiding two or more PCs behind same IP address and MAC) can break IPsec VPN, including Nortel - depending on the configuration. Lately they are fine. -- Show quoteHide quoteSvyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- "Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1157560969.561644.222770@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... > > garciyala***@hotmail.com wrote: >> wireless router and you are done....... >> or just create a vpn connection to whichever computer is online...... >> you could jump on someones unsecured netowork.... > > Hi Chuck, > > Thanks for the advice; but I don't understand two of your three > suggestions: > > SUGGESTION 1: > - Wireless router > - I'm fifteen countries away from my home; where would I get a > wireless router? > > SUGGESTION 2: > - Create a vpn connection. > - I do not understand this at all. Yes, I have the Nortel Networks > Contivity VPN client. > - But, without a network, how would I use this to connect my two > computers? > > SUGGESTION 3: > - Jump on someone elses' unsecured network. > - I always wondered how to do that. > - If I "see" someone else's network, just connecting to it doesn't give > me Internet access. > - Am I doing something wrong? > > Chuck ... I do appreciate your help. But, can you clarify how I could > use the Nortel VPN software to connect a second PC to the first PC's > wired ethernet connection? > > Same with jumping on someone else's network. Once I "connect" ... why > don't I have any Internet access when I connect to someone's unsecured > connection? What am I doing wrong? > > Cindy > > You might consider a small travel type wireless router. I've used a linksys WTR54GS for this purpose for several years now.http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1122062241008&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper Or using tinyurl to shorten that hideously long URL: http://tinyurl.com/b9ts2 The nice thing about this unit is it's built-in AC plug. So you don't have to carry along yet ANOTHER wall wart AC adapter (or forget to bring it, as experience shows...) Plug it into the wall and run the ethernet cable into it. If there's a PC already using that outlet, no problem, just plug the PC into the second outlet on the WTR54GS. Works great. -Bill Kearney Bill Kearney wrote:
> I've used a linksys WTR54GS for this purpose for several years now. Hi Bill Kearney,> http://tinyurl.com/b9ts2 > The nice thing about this unit is it's built-in AC plug. Thank you for your advice. When I left on this trip two weeks ago, that's when I should have thought of it. As it was, I had to buy a whole bunch of British-style three square prong adapters to fit the American-style two-blade plug of my computer. At the moment, I'm in a strange city (Singapore) and I don't have a clue what is where as I just arrived today. In two days, I'll fly to the Philippines and then to Beijing so I'm trying to travel ligthly. Next time I might pick up the router in the states as far too many hotels have wired but not wireless Interner connections in the rooms (and wireless is so very nice when you're relaxing in bed). Thanks for your advice. At the moment, I'm stuck trying to get the second computer to connect to the first via the wireless. I already tried the MAC address change and that worked, but, it's wired and I prefer to be wireless by far. But, for want of a setting or two I would be wireless, Cindy On 9/6/2006 12:48 PM Cindy plucked Senior Frog's Magic Twanger and said:
Show quoteHide quote > Bill Kearney wrote: I picked up your message in rec.travel.usa-canada. Until I opened my > >> I've used a linksys WTR54GS for this purpose for several years now. >> http://tinyurl.com/b9ts2 >> The nice thing about this unit is it's built-in AC plug. >> > > Hi Bill Kearney, > Thank you for your advice. When I left on this trip two weeks ago, > that's when I should have thought of it. As it was, I had to buy a > whole bunch of British-style three square prong adapters to fit the > American-style two-blade plug of my computer. > > At the moment, I'm in a strange city (Singapore) and I don't have a > clue what is where as I just arrived today. In two days, I'll fly to > the Philippines and then to Beijing so I'm trying to travel ligthly. > > Next time I might pick up the router in the states as far too many > hotels have wired but not wireless Interner connections in the rooms > (and wireless is so very nice when you're relaxing in bed). > > Thanks for your advice. At the moment, I'm stuck trying to get the > second computer to connect to the first via the wireless. I already > tried the MAC address change and that worked, but, it's wired and I > prefer to be wireless by far. > > But, for want of a setting or two I would be wireless, > Cindy > > Cindy, reply I wasn't aware that you have cross-posted to two technical groups as well. I was going to suggest that you post to one. All the same I will post a list of some non-Usenet http forums that I have found very useful. Windows BBS - http://tinyurl.com/rlq89 Windows Annoyances Network FAQ - http://tinyurl.com/3vkc There is also a discussion forum for Windows Annoyances at: - http://tinyurl.com/844gw Hope that this helps. -- ________ To email me, Edit "blog" from my email address. Brian M. Kochera "Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once!" View My Web Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~brian1951 On 6 Sep 2006 01:32:38 -0700 "Cindy" <cxsingap***@yahoo.com> wrote: You are OK with $30/day????:>Can you help me network a single wired Internet connection at my hotel :>with my :>two wireless computers? :>The hotel charges $30/day for the wired Internet connection, which is :>OK. I ain't happy with $12/day. :> However, they charge for each laptop which I find to be highway Yes.:>robbery especially since they only supply wired Internet so there's no :>way to share between rooms. :>Luckily, both Windows XP computers are wireless. :>Is there any way to use the wireless part of the WinXP computers to :>SHARE the initial connection? :>Is this too basic a question? Probably.Do it just like you do at home - use a router. It can clone your MAC address. Curios minds wish to know - which hotel (it has got to be in NYC) charges that much? -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis***@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> :>The hotel charges $30/day for the wired Internet connection, which is Hi Binyamin Dissen,> > You are OK with $30/day???? > I ain't happy with $12/day. I should have noted these are $30 Singapore dollars per day for the wired hotel network. That's about 30 x 2/3 = $20 US dollars a day which is OK by me for a wired hotel network. What I'm taking as a theoretical study (which is eating into my vacation because I hate to lose a technical challenge) is how I can use my second laptop to connect wirelessly to the first laptop which is connected to the wired network. Achieving the most of wireless is what wireless is all about; so that's why I'm trying this. I've already agreed these OTHER approaches work: a) Buy a compact wireless router to be wireless on BOTH PCs by hooking the NAT to the hotel network and using the two wireless PCs anywhere in the hotel room b) Spoof the MAC address on the second PC & connect one PC at a time to the short wired network c) Connect wirelessly from the second PC to the wired first PC. It is the third approach I'm trying to get working as the other two are (by now) obvious. It would be great to make the most of our wireless cards like God herself intended us to do by giving us electromagnetic waves in the first place! I'm still trying to implement the steps in the Microsoft article cited. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/bowman_02april08.mspx An alternative source for the same setup would be wonderful as something is missing from the instructions at that Microsoft web site. Cindy On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:45:36 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
<postin***@dissensoftware.com> wrote: >Do it just like you do at home - use a router. It can clone your MAC address. I have never been able to get this to work in a hotel. I've been toldthat it can work but the addresses have to be manipulated. I don't have problems at home. Have you actually done this in a hotel? In article <h3i6g2tl2a2rsvmam4o3h586suma5ag***@4ax.com>,
Brian <drmorrisnospam@comcast.net> wrote: > On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:45:36 +0300, Binyamin Dissen I have done it several times in hotels and at home, it is a very common > <postin***@dissensoftware.com> wrote: > > > >Do it just like you do at home - use a router. It can clone your MAC address. > > I have never been able to get this to work in a hotel. I've been told > that it can work but the addresses have to be manipulated. I don't > have problems at home. > > Have you actually done this in a hotel? thing for people to do.
Signal Strength
Hdwre Wizard Cannot Install - ar5416.sys not found Slow Internet Connection Disabling some wireless connections Networking desktop with laptop file & printer sharing probs-XP2 File share problem urghhhh Wireless Connection Disappears Wireless network connection problems Bluetooth Help |
|||||||||||||||||||||||