|
windows
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Search for Bluetooth Devices - how many it will display?Search for Devices looks for Bluetooth devices – but how many devices
can it found – for an example if there is about 50 devices (10 meters from computer) will it display all 50 devices, and I can choose the device I want to connect? Maybe it depends from the device? But what it is the standard? It can probably "see" all of them, but only connect to 7 at a time.
Look at Trust - Bluetooth information: http://www.trust.com/service/help/bluetooth/#4 Under 4.3 "A master Bluetooth device can connect to a maximum of 7 slave devices." -Dan Show quoteHide quote "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:%23ThzQQX6GHA.3836@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Search for Devices looks for Bluetooth devices - but how many devices can > it found - for an example if there is about 50 devices (10 meters from > computer) will it display all 50 devices, and I can choose the device I > want to connect? > > Maybe it depends from the device? But what it is the standard? LittleMoo napisa³(a):
> It can probably "see" all of them, but only connect to 7 at a time. I know that I can connect to 7 at a time - but I need to know that I will see all of them - is there a maximum? Your answer is 255 inactive + 7 active at a time.
Answer gotten from: Bluetooth Communication & connection on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Communication_.26_connection -Dan Show quoteHide quote "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:%23766WQY6GHA.4568@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > LittleMoo napisa³(a): >> It can probably "see" all of them, but only connect to 7 at a time. > > I know that I can connect to 7 at a time - but I need to know that I will > see all of them - is there a maximum? > Your answer is 255 inactive + 7 active at a time. Thank you! And the final question could you recommend and BlueTooth > > Answer gotten from: > Bluetooth Communication & connection on Wikipedia: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Communication_.26_connection deviced that I can connect via USB compatybile with 255 inactive + 7 active at a time? Any device that supports Bluetooth will support the 255 + 7 connections - if
you have a wireless card in your laptop then it might support bluetooth. There isn't one device in particular that I could recommend, but a lot of cell phones and PDA's use bluetooth. -Dan Show quoteHide quote "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:u5QjfvY6GHA.2384@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Your answer is 255 inactive + 7 active at a time. >> >> Answer gotten from: >> Bluetooth Communication & connection on Wikipedia: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Communication_.26_connection > > > Thank you! And the final question could you recommend and BlueTooth > deviced that I can connect via USB compatybile with 255 inactive + 7 > active at a time? ### Wrong ####
Bluetooth needs the device to be in a discoverable mode to be found as part of the security. As such if you are in a school with say 200 Bluetooth devices and you try to discover them, you may discover none of them, or just a few that happen to be in discoverable mode at the time. David Hettel Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com DISCLAIMER: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Show quoteHide quote "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:u5QjfvY6GHA.2384@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Your answer is 255 inactive + 7 active at a time. >> >> Answer gotten from: >> Bluetooth Communication & connection on Wikipedia: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Communication_.26_connection > > > Thank you! And the final question could you recommend and BlueTooth > deviced that I can connect via USB compatybile with 255 inactive + 7 > active at a time? I was only going by the Bluetooth specs for this, not actual real-world
situations. In theory though if there were say 50 devices all in discoverable mode and one laptop that has a Bluetooth USB adapter used as the master device then the spec says that the laptop should be able to (theoretically) "see" all of them. I don't know what the purpose of something like this would be though. Show quoteHide quote "David Hettel" <no***@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:%23FJ618b6GHA.4996@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > ### Wrong #### > > Bluetooth needs the device to be in a discoverable mode to be found as > part of the security. As such if you are in a school with say 200 > Bluetooth devices and you try to discover them, you may discover none of > them, or just a few that happen to be in discoverable mode at the time. > > David Hettel > > Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group > for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions > addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. > > Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com > > DISCLAIMER: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights > > > > > "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message > news:u5QjfvY6GHA.2384@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> Your answer is 255 inactive + 7 active at a time. >>> >>> Answer gotten from: >>> Bluetooth Communication & connection on Wikipedia: >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Communication_.26_connection >> >> >> Thank you! And the final question could you recommend and BlueTooth >> deviced that I can connect via USB compatybile with 255 inactive + 7 >> active at a time? > > LittleMoo napisa³(a):
> I was only going by the Bluetooth specs for this, not actual real-world I need to identify people that have GSM/bloetooth with discoverable > situations. In theory though if there were say 50 devices all in > discoverable mode and one laptop that has a Bluetooth USB adapter used as > the master device then the spec says that the laptop should be able to > (theoretically) "see" all of them. I don't know what the purpose of > something like this would be though. mode, I don't want to connect them only identify. So are you sure that I see all of them? Most devices implement "discoverable" mode for only a few seconds at a time.
As such if you had a room full of 200 people, and you told them to put their device into discoverable mode now, in theory you'd get a list of all of them. Having actually used Bluetooth, I'd say it's very unlikely you'd get a list of all of them in the above example If on the other hand you did not tell them to put their device into discoverable mode, you simply had a room full of 200 people with cell phones I would expect to see 0 found. Does that help any? -- Show quoteHide quoteDavid Hettel Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com DISCLAIMER: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:O1wTiNg6GHA.2364@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > LittleMoo napisa³(a): >> I was only going by the Bluetooth specs for this, not actual real-world >> situations. In theory though if there were say 50 devices all in >> discoverable mode and one laptop that has a Bluetooth USB adapter used as >> the master device then the spec says that the laptop should be able to >> (theoretically) "see" all of them. I don't know what the purpose of >> something like this would be though. > > I need to identify people that have GSM/bloetooth with discoverable mode, > I don't want to connect them only identify. So are you sure that I see all > of them? David Hettel napisa³(a):
> Most devices implement "discoverable" mode for only a few seconds at a time. Next example I told 200 people to switch on BlueTooth and make it > As such if you had a room full of 200 people, and you told them to put their > device into discoverable mode now, in theory you'd get a list of all of > them. public. And after some days (people didn't change anything on their GSM) people are seating at room for 2 hours and on my computer I click Search for Devices - will I see all devices in the room? "Make it public" is not a blue tooth command, if you told two hundred people
to switch there phone on and make it discoverable, and they attempted to do it, I feel safe in saying no, you'll not find them all, nor even a great number of then. It's very unlikely that you could get two hundred people to do basically the same thing within 10 seconds of each other, in my experience. Also as one who gives help with Bluetooth devices, it's unlikely that all two hundred people would even know how to make their device discoverable. This is something you might normally do once or twice a year with a manual telling you how. It's generally not straight forward to accomplish or simple. Normally it's buried several menus down in the device. Different firmware on a device may also change where and how you do this, so even if everyone had the same model of phone, different firmware can change how you do this. Another potential problem is there is not one way of displaying the Bluetooth devices discovered. Some devices may keep past devices, and others if they are not refound will drop them from the display. So say you "hunt" for devices and find 75, devices in the first 10 seconds, in the next scan you find 50, some of the 50 may be the same as those found in your first scan, but some of the first scan may no longer be in discoverable mode, so they are removed from the list of those displayed. Do you see the problem here, you may need to get all in the same mode, within 2 to 3 seconds of each other, to give your device time to talk to each one it sees. So yes in theory it may work, in reality I'd need to see in demonstrated with a random group of users before I'd believe it. And I would never count on it working. -- Show quoteHide quoteDavid Hettel Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program http://mvp.support.microsoft.com DISCLAIMER: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:eaziwUi6GHA.1248@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > David Hettel napisa³(a): >> Most devices implement "discoverable" mode for only a few seconds at a >> time. As such if you had a room full of 200 people, and you told them to >> put their device into discoverable mode now, in theory you'd get a list >> of all of them. > > Next example I told 200 people to switch on BlueTooth and make it public. > And after some days (people didn't change anything on their GSM) people > are seating at room for 2 hours and on my computer I click Search for > Devices - will I see all devices in the room? > So yes in theory it may work, in reality I'd need to see in demonstrated The first establishment is that one day I will configure all phones and > with a random group of users before I'd believe it. And I would never count > on it working. the second establishment is that people don't change anything (settings) on their mobile phones. And after some days they meet toogether in one room and I would like to press Search for all devices in range (I can click it several times) and for example for about 30 minutes I will find them all. Is it true or not? (Of course - I will write application for it). Does .Net 2.0 support bluetooth communication especially Search for all devices? For .Net development under Windows XP, 2000, etc. the short answer is no.
For .Net development under Windows CE (for Pocket PCs) you would be able to. However - there is at least one way to use .Net under XP for Bluetooth development, but it is not free. It's an SDK called BlueTools (about $100): http://franson.com/bluetools/ You might be able to accomplish this by using WidComm drivers and the Microsoft Bluetooth Stack drivers in a .Net application - but as there is probably poor documentation of these drivers under XP at best then this would be very hard to accomplish. -Dan Show quoteHide quote "sp" <kofa@noemail.noemail> wrote in message news:u8w7JYr6GHA.4580@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> So yes in theory it may work, in reality I'd need to see in demonstrated >> with a random group of users before I'd believe it. And I would never >> count on it working. > > > The first establishment is that one day I will configure all phones and > the second establishment is that people don't change anything (settings) > on their mobile phones. > > And after some days they meet toogether in one room and I would like to > press Search for all devices in range (I can click it several times) and > for example for about 30 minutes I will find them all. Is it true or not? > (Of course - I will write application for it). > > > Does .Net 2.0 support bluetooth communication especially Search for all > devices?
Is a PC vulnerable if wireless is on but not connected to a networ
Frequent hangs securing mobile users at hotspots Cannot detect cardbus suspect someone stealing access Wireless connection problem "handshake/looking" take 10min, Rt61 (with Xp drivers) and Zyxel 6 Networking doesnt seem to load on xp Wireless not starting neighbor using wireless connection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||